1995
DOI: 10.1016/0886-1633(95)90002-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeking multicultural validity: A postcard from the road

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The item developers have teaching experience for the subject of Mathematics ranged from five to 17 years. The items were developed with bilingual version: English language and Malaysian national language using backward translation from English to Malaysian national language due to the concern of multicultural validity as pointed out by Kirkhart (1995). Multicultural validity refers to an instrument measures what it supposes to measure as understood by the respondents of a particular culture (Kirkhart, 1995).…”
Section: Stage 2 Instrument Development and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The item developers have teaching experience for the subject of Mathematics ranged from five to 17 years. The items were developed with bilingual version: English language and Malaysian national language using backward translation from English to Malaysian national language due to the concern of multicultural validity as pointed out by Kirkhart (1995). Multicultural validity refers to an instrument measures what it supposes to measure as understood by the respondents of a particular culture (Kirkhart, 1995).…”
Section: Stage 2 Instrument Development and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relates to standards of communitybased research, which require that research produces community benefits as well as academic findings (Kowalsky et al 1996;Smith 1999). Both the evaluation exercise and the results of the evaluation have the capacity to effect change (Kirkhart 1995 It was critical for me to understand and attend to these aforementioned components of validity in order to establish a strong methodological foundation for this research, develop the proposed method (Chapter 4) and evaluate the success of the method (Chapter 5). This interpretation of validity was also used as a criterion to delineate effective Tl'azt'en measures of adaptive forest co-management (Section 5.2).…”
Section: Aboriginal Involvement In Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design logic refers to how the method addresses standard definitions of internal and external validity (Kirkhart 1995), which are reviewed in Section 4.1. Interpersonal validity speaks to a researcher's awareness and sensibility, addressing for example cross-cultural communication barriers, biases based on the researcher's own culture, and other dimensions of interpersonal influence.…”
Section: Aboriginal Involvement In Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations