2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17798-0_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeking Optimum System Settings for Physical Activity Recognition on Smartwatches

Abstract: Physical activity recognition using wearable devices can provide valued information regarding an individual's degree of functional ability and lifestyle. Smartphone-based physical activity recognition is a well-studied area. However, research on smartwatch-based physical activity recognition, on the other hand, is still in its infancy. Through a largescale exploratory study, this work aims to investigate the smartwatchbased physical activity recognition domain. A detailed analysis of various feature banks and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ese sensors support similar capabilities and applications of smartphones such as healthcare applications that require physical activity recognition (PAR). e accelerometer, linear accelerometer, magnetometer, and gyroscope sensors are ideal for PAR and gaitbased legitimate user identification over SPs [4][5][6][7]. is work will show that SWs are equally capable of performing PAR and gait-based legitimate user identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ese sensors support similar capabilities and applications of smartphones such as healthcare applications that require physical activity recognition (PAR). e accelerometer, linear accelerometer, magnetometer, and gyroscope sensors are ideal for PAR and gaitbased legitimate user identification over SPs [4][5][6][7]. is work will show that SWs are equally capable of performing PAR and gait-based legitimate user identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…is technique permits the use of traditional machine learning classification approaches to handling the time series data. Our proposed study also utilizes the same sliding window approach employed in the prior work [2,[5][6][7]. e discussed windowing process initially partitions the time series raw signal into 30 seconds non-overlapping windows.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ARIMA model is a widely used timeseries forecasting model introduced by Box and Jenkins in 1970 [12]. ARIMA model is a general linear stochastic model which is the combination of autoregressive and movingaverage models [13][14][15]. An autoregressive model uses a linear combination of past values to predict the variable of interest.…”
Section: Arima Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wearable systems are particularly suitable to sport-specific needs (van der Kruk and Reijne, 2018 ), since: (1) sport usually takes place in uncontrolled and unstructured settings, with environmental conditions difficult to be predicted a priori (e.g., weather, interaction with equipment and other people) and many possible measurement interferences (e.g., electromagnetic noise); (2) the size of the acquisition volume inherently depends on the type of practiced sport (e.g., team vs. individual, indoor vs. outdoor); (3) sensors used to capture sports movements should be both robust and non-obtrusive for the athlete (i.e., ecologically transparent). Systems based on wearable devices, including low-cost activity trackers, smartwatches and smartphones (Ahmad et al, 2017 ), have kept evolving and are widely available for the consumer market, including clinical uses and sports applications (Ghazali et al, 2018 ; Hsu et al, 2018 ). Wearable technologies for motion analysis are predominantly inertial measurement units (IMUs) (Davila et al, 2017 ), which, thanks to their low cost and minimal obtrusiveness, represent an optimal solution for tracking and assessing sports movement on-field (Hsu et al, 2018 ; van der Kruk and Reijne, 2018 ; Adesida et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%