“…Wearable systems are particularly suitable to sport-specific needs (van der Kruk and Reijne, 2018 ), since: (1) sport usually takes place in uncontrolled and unstructured settings, with environmental conditions difficult to be predicted a priori (e.g., weather, interaction with equipment and other people) and many possible measurement interferences (e.g., electromagnetic noise); (2) the size of the acquisition volume inherently depends on the type of practiced sport (e.g., team vs. individual, indoor vs. outdoor); (3) sensors used to capture sports movements should be both robust and non-obtrusive for the athlete (i.e., ecologically transparent). Systems based on wearable devices, including low-cost activity trackers, smartwatches and smartphones (Ahmad et al, 2017 ), have kept evolving and are widely available for the consumer market, including clinical uses and sports applications (Ghazali et al, 2018 ; Hsu et al, 2018 ). Wearable technologies for motion analysis are predominantly inertial measurement units (IMUs) (Davila et al, 2017 ), which, thanks to their low cost and minimal obtrusiveness, represent an optimal solution for tracking and assessing sports movement on-field (Hsu et al, 2018 ; van der Kruk and Reijne, 2018 ; Adesida et al, 2019 ).…”