1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30315-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segment durations in a syllable frame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
34
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact tradeoff between elongating a syllable and compressing a segment is expressed by assigning weights to each constraint. This approach is part of a larger class of theories that view segment duration as wholly-or partially-dependent upon the constraints imposed by a higher-level duration frame (Kozhevnikov & Chistovich, 1965;Lehiste, 1970;Witten, 1977;Campbell & Isard, 1991;Campbell, 2000;inter alia). In the particular version sketched here, the grammar favors long segments for perceptibility; it also enforces a duration target on larger units, to foster rapid and efficient communication (Liberman et al 1967, Mattingly 1981 and at least a tendency towards isochrony.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exact tradeoff between elongating a syllable and compressing a segment is expressed by assigning weights to each constraint. This approach is part of a larger class of theories that view segment duration as wholly-or partially-dependent upon the constraints imposed by a higher-level duration frame (Kozhevnikov & Chistovich, 1965;Lehiste, 1970;Witten, 1977;Campbell & Isard, 1991;Campbell, 2000;inter alia). In the particular version sketched here, the grammar favors long segments for perceptibility; it also enforces a duration target on larger units, to foster rapid and efficient communication (Liberman et al 1967, Mattingly 1981 and at least a tendency towards isochrony.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compression effects are of interest, among other reasons, because they have been explained both as an emergent property of independent principles of articulatory coordination (Fowler, 1981;Nam, Goldstein, & Saltzman, 2009) and as a product of constraints that directly regulate acoustic duration (Campbell & Isard, 1991;Clements & Hertz, 1996;Flemming, 2001;Lindblom & Rapp, 1973;Maddieson, 1985;Myers, 1987). As such, clarifying the situation with regard to compression may allow us to shed some light on the general properties of phonetic representations of timing, a foundational question in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, the different explanation implies a different model of articulatory timing control. The syllable-based explanation implies a single level of control where segmental duration patterns are attributed either to syllable-size temporal frames (Campbell & Isard, 1991 ;Klatt, 1976 ;Lehiste, 1970) or to intergestural articulatory timing routines within the syllable (Browman & Goldstein, 1988 ;Krakow,1999). By contrast, a suprasyllabic explanation suggests layered control over articulatory timing.…”
Section: G E N E R a L Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durational cues to juncture have traditionally been explained in terms of the syllable (e.g. Browman & Goldstein, 1988 ;Campbell & Isard, 1991 ;Klatt, 1976 ;Krakow, 1999 ;Lehiste, 1970). That is, syllables are thought to either provide the temporal frame within which segmental duration is adjusted or the domain within which articulatory timing is specified.…”
Section: Juncture In Speech Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limiting factor is the phone itself. Different phones have different inherent elasticity [22,23], which has direct implications for parametric speech synthesis: prolonging phones to a degree exceeding their elasticity may result in degraded and buzzy sound quality.…”
Section: Duration Modifications For Initial and Final Lengtheningmentioning
confidence: 99%