2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36390-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmental motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury relates to density and integrity of corticospinal tract projections

Abstract: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) causes extensive impairments for individuals which may include dextrous hand function. Although prior work has focused on the recovery at the person-level, the factors determining the recovery of individual muscles are poorly understood. Here, we investigate the muscle-specific recovery after cervical spinal cord injury in a retrospective analysis of 748 individuals from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (NCT01571531). We show associations between cortico… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings revealed that single session ( Benavides et al, 2020 ) or multiple sessions ( Murray and Knikou, 2017 ) of AC-TSCS without carrier frequency can increase the MEPs amplitudes associated with upper extremity muscles along with improvement in voluntary muscle strength and upper limb motor function ( Murray and Knikou, 2017 ; Benavides et al, 2020 ). We believe that further understanding of the corticospinal mechanisms associated with recovery of upper limb motor function following TSCS intervention specifically targeted at the cervical enlargement is of significant importance after SCI as cervical spinal motorneurons receive extensive inputs from corticospinal tracts ( Balbinot et al, 2023 ). Emerging evidence also suggests that the neuroplasticity induced by spinal cord stimulation also depends on the number of residual supraspinal inputs survived, thereby limiting the effects of TSCS in situations involving a substantial loss of supraspinal axons ( Balaguer et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings revealed that single session ( Benavides et al, 2020 ) or multiple sessions ( Murray and Knikou, 2017 ) of AC-TSCS without carrier frequency can increase the MEPs amplitudes associated with upper extremity muscles along with improvement in voluntary muscle strength and upper limb motor function ( Murray and Knikou, 2017 ; Benavides et al, 2020 ). We believe that further understanding of the corticospinal mechanisms associated with recovery of upper limb motor function following TSCS intervention specifically targeted at the cervical enlargement is of significant importance after SCI as cervical spinal motorneurons receive extensive inputs from corticospinal tracts ( Balbinot et al, 2023 ). Emerging evidence also suggests that the neuroplasticity induced by spinal cord stimulation also depends on the number of residual supraspinal inputs survived, thereby limiting the effects of TSCS in situations involving a substantial loss of supraspinal axons ( Balaguer et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rehabilitation following SCI is primarily composed of repetitive movements over long periods to facilitate motor recovery. Such training has been proved to be related to corticospinal tract projections [ 44 ] and neural adaptations in secondary tracts [ 45 ]. Despite the cortical effort required, the increased muscle activity in SCI patients may be supported by subcortical structures including the reticulospinal and rubrospinal tracts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomical studies have long reported some continuity across the injured segment in at least half of the examined clinically motor complete SCI cases [5,6]. A recent retrospective analysis using the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury dataset reported that about 14% of individuals with present motor evoked potentials (indicating preserved connections traversing the injury zone) were sensorimotor complete cases [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%