1964
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4804(64)80112-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmental replacement of the thoracic esophagus with woven teflon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these have consisted mainly of synthetic materials and, therefore, carry a risk of serious complications, such as leakage, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] infection, [3][4][5] ulceration, 8,9 granulation, 1,2,[6][7][8][9][10] and migration of the prosthesis. [2][3][4][5][6][7]10 Formerly, migration of the prosthesis was considered to be the major problem to be overcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, these have consisted mainly of synthetic materials and, therefore, carry a risk of serious complications, such as leakage, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] infection, [3][4][5] ulceration, 8,9 granulation, 1,2,[6][7][8][9][10] and migration of the prosthesis. [2][3][4][5][6][7]10 Formerly, migration of the prosthesis was considered to be the major problem to be overcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these have consisted mainly of synthetic materials and, therefore, carry a risk of serious complications, such as leakage, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] infection, [3][4][5] ulceration, 8,9 granulation, 1,2,[6][7][8][9][10] and migration of the prosthesis. [2][3][4][5][6][7]10 Formerly, migration of the prosthesis was considered to be the major problem to be overcome. 1,10 However, when we examined these results carefully, we found that the unexpected migration of the prosthesis induced neo-epithelialization at the reconstructed site, whereas such epithelialization did not occur when the prosthesis remained at the implantation site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Attempts to perform esophageal replacement using artificial nonabsorbable materials, such as Teflon, polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, or silicone, have failed because these materials are not biocompatible, resulting in chronic infection, anastomotic leakage, material extrusion, and strictures. Although it has been performed in the past, esophageal allotransplantation is not a realistic option because of the complexity of the esophageal vascular anatomy and the necessity for chronic immunosuppression.…”
Section: Full‐thickness Esophageal Te Using Scaffolds and Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fryfogle replaced segments of the thoracic oesophagus in dogs using silicon rubber prostheses of varying rigidity [15]. Morfit and Mark used teflon prostheses to replace the thoracic oesophagus [25,27]. Kamal, on the other hand, used a marlex mesh to replace Group B, incomplete gap (L4 -L9): a wedge segment of the oesophagus was excised (10 -20 mm long) after division of the oesophagus and a Silastic tube was anastomosed to the inner mucosa of both oesophageal edges 5 mm from the edge, using a prolene 7/0 suture to perform a single layer continuous anastomosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%