1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1986.tb02607.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmental Uterine Horn Replacement in the Rat Using a Biodegradable Microporous Synthetic Tube

Abstract: To investigate the possible use of a biodegradable microporous synthetic tube for fallopian tube replacement, polyetherurethane/poly-L-lactide (PU/PLLA) grafts in the uterine horn of the rat were studied and their patency and healing characteristics compared with those of nonbiodegradable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE; Teflon) grafts as well as with those of reanastomosed uterine horns. Regarding the healing characteristics, the PU/PLLA grafts were superior to the PTFE graft, as was indicated by the regenerati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No obstruction was observed at the implant/native tissue anastomoses as opposed to a study by Jonkman et al [32] in which the artery were occluded by blood clot due to failure of vascularization into scaffold. Patency of the reconstructed uterus was similar to native tissue proving decellularized tissue to be superior to porcine SIS graft [33] where samples larger than 1 mm were found to be twisted due to lack of mechanical strength.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…No obstruction was observed at the implant/native tissue anastomoses as opposed to a study by Jonkman et al [32] in which the artery were occluded by blood clot due to failure of vascularization into scaffold. Patency of the reconstructed uterus was similar to native tissue proving decellularized tissue to be superior to porcine SIS graft [33] where samples larger than 1 mm were found to be twisted due to lack of mechanical strength.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Exploratory uterine bioengineering attempts in animal models have used synthetic materials for scaffolding, such as polytetrafluoroethylene, polyether urethane/poly-L-lactide, and collagen, and biological materials, including animal small-intestine submucosa, for reconstructing the uterine horns. [54][55][56] Recently, several groups have reported using anionic detergent [57][58][59] or high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) treatment to decellularize the rat uterus. 57 A key advantage of this methodology is its ability to preserve both tissue-specific extracellular matrix and 3D architecture, providing crucial cues for cell engraftment.…”
Section: Uterine Bioengineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental models of uterine injury have also been harnessed to explore a remarkable breadth of therapeutic strategies for preventing and treating IUAs. These include a variety of biocompatible materials that may be transplanted into the injured uterus to serve as cellular scaffolds or enable the release of proregenerative factors ( Jonkman et al 1986, Li et al 2011, Taveau et al 2004reviewed in Yin et al 2023). Additionally, considerable effort has gone toward developing approaches to transplant putative stem/progenitor cells or enhance their homing to the target tissue (Sahin Ersoy et al 2017).…”
Section: Therapeutic Management Of Uterine Fibrosismentioning
confidence: 99%