2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation and Classification in Digital Pathology for Glioma Research: Challenges and Deep Learning Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Advances in machine learning allow for data to be obtained from radiographic imaging (i.e. Radiomics) and digital pathology to enhance diagnosis and predict genomic biomarkers (49)(50)(51)(52)(53). These data will likely lead to the ability of predicting tumor subtype and prognosis prior to surgical resection.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in machine learning allow for data to be obtained from radiographic imaging (i.e. Radiomics) and digital pathology to enhance diagnosis and predict genomic biomarkers (49)(50)(51)(52)(53). These data will likely lead to the ability of predicting tumor subtype and prognosis prior to surgical resection.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of the dataset without annotation allows our algorithm to learn from the full files of slides that are presented to clinicians from real-world clinical practice, representing the full wealth of biological and technical variablitiy [ 34 ]. To the best of our knowledge, only robust studies were conducted with the deep learning approach using the publicly available digital WSI dataset in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) or The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) to automate the classification of grade II, III glioma versus grade IV glioblastoma, which demonstrated up to 96% accuracy [ 35 , 36 , 37 ] However, the datasets used in the above studies are composed of many cases diagnosed before the application of the WHO’s new 2016 classification; therefore, the algorithm that was developed using the public database might not be suitable for the current WHO classification system. A recent study tried deep learning approaches for subtype classification according to the 2016 WHO classification and survival prediction using multimodal magnetic resonance images of a brain tumor [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our last approach, which uses deep learning, applies a mask region-based convolutional neural network (R-CNN). Many digital pathology approaches have used mask R-CNNs in applications of nuclei segmentation 12 and cancer [35][36][37] . Similar to our study, these studies spatially identified specific features (e.g., nuclei).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%