2015
DOI: 10.1118/1.4903281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation‐free empirical beam hardening correction for CT

Abstract: sfEBHC generates beam hardening-reduced images and is furthermore capable of dealing with images which are affected by high noise and strong artifacts. The algorithm can be used to recover structures which are hardly visible inside the beam hardening-affected regions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a polynomial beam‐hardening correction function G(praw), we needed to find the coefficients of the correction function that satisfied Gfalse(pitalicrawfalse)pmono, where pitalicmono is monochromatic projection data. In the conventional beam‐hardening correction method, the path lengths or the repeated evaluation of the artifacts in the reconstructed images are used to obtain these coefficients . In our study, we proposed a method to effectively determine the coefficients using a prior image without the time‐consuming repeated evaluation of the multiple reconstructions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a polynomial beam‐hardening correction function G(praw), we needed to find the coefficients of the correction function that satisfied Gfalse(pitalicrawfalse)pmono, where pitalicmono is monochromatic projection data. In the conventional beam‐hardening correction method, the path lengths or the repeated evaluation of the artifacts in the reconstructed images are used to obtain these coefficients . In our study, we proposed a method to effectively determine the coefficients using a prior image without the time‐consuming repeated evaluation of the multiple reconstructions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the conventional beam-hardening correction method, the path lengths or the repeated evaluation of the artifacts in the reconstructed images are used to obtain these coefficients. 6,7,13,14 In our study, we proposed a method to effectively determine the coefficients using a prior image without the time-consuming repeated evaluation of the multiple reconstructions. If we know the ideal p mono , we can determine the optimal coefficients that minimize the difference between Gðp raw Þ and p mono .…”
Section: B2 Prior Image Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in the results of the Rando® phantom, this technique needs further improvement when the scanned object contains dense materials and the SPR on projections is high. A more sophisticated model, as used in the beam-hardening correction of CT imaging, 33 will increase the scatter estimation accuracy. Since the signal modulation is not required to be uniform in LFPM, one may use an irregular modulation pattern to optimize scatter correction.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been proposed to decrease metal artifacts and improve image quality. To our knowledge, two strategies have been widely investigated: (1) improvement in the system model by introducing the imaging physics, such as beam hardening and scattering [4][5][6][7][8][9] and (2) involvement of reconstruction methods that only adopt the unaffected projection data. The strategy that involves the modeling of the physics of the data acquisition is shown to remove metal artifacts while preserving the edges and structures when the projection data through the metal could still provide information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%