1984
DOI: 10.1016/0734-189x(84)90197-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation of a high-resolution urban scene using texture operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
164
0
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
164
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[10] Image texture, as defined by the cooccurrence matrix, was among the first local image properties to be developed capable of segmenting image areas that appear visually distinct to a human observer [Haralick et al, 1973;Haralick, 1979;Conners et al, 1984]. It is therefore reasonable to hypothesize that image texture may allow for grain size determination since patches of different grain sizes appear distinct to a human observer provided image resolution is sufficient.…”
Section: Mapping Grain Size From Airborne Imagery: Theoretical Considmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] Image texture, as defined by the cooccurrence matrix, was among the first local image properties to be developed capable of segmenting image areas that appear visually distinct to a human observer [Haralick et al, 1973;Haralick, 1979;Conners et al, 1984]. It is therefore reasonable to hypothesize that image texture may allow for grain size determination since patches of different grain sizes appear distinct to a human observer provided image resolution is sufficient.…”
Section: Mapping Grain Size From Airborne Imagery: Theoretical Considmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen features proposed by [51] and three features from [52] are derived. This selection fits with their function availability in the Google Earth Engine (GEE) [53].…”
Section: Vegetation Index (Vi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table A1 lists textural features from [51] with their corresponding formulas; in these, we have used the following notational conventions: p(i, j) is the (i,j)th entry in a normalized gray tone matrix, p x (i) = ∑ N g j = 1 P(i, j) is the ith entry in the marginal-probability matrix computed by summing the rows of p(i, j) , for fixed i, p x (j) = ∑ N g j = 1 P(i, j), is the jth entry in the marginal-probability matrix computed by summing the columns of p(i, j) , for fixed j, N g , is the number of distinct gray levels in the quantized image, p x+y (k) = ∑ N g i = 1 ∑ N g j = 1 p(i, j) i+j = k , and p x−y (k) = ∑ N g i = 1 ∑ N g j = 1 p(i, j) |i−j| = k Table A2 specifies names of the textural features proposed by [52], and their formulas, in which the following notation is used: s(i, j, δ, T) is the (i,j)th entry in a normalized gray level matrix, equivalent to p(i,j), T represents the region and shape used to estimate the second order probabilities, and δ = (∆x, ∆y) is the displacement vector. Table A1.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First-order statistics refer to the marginal grey level distribution, second-order statistics to the joint grey level distribution of pairs of pixels, and higher-order statistics to the joint grey level distribution of three or more pixels. The basic computation of 14 features was introduced by Haralick et al (1973) and later complemented by others (Conners et al, 1984;Parkkinen et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%