2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25944-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation of Fundus Eye Images Using Methods of Mathematical Morphology for Glaucoma Diagnosis

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper the new method for automatic segmentation of cup and optic disc in fundus eye images taken from classical fundus camera is proposed. The proposed method is fully based on techniques from mathematical morphology. Detection of cup region makes use of watershed transformation with markers imposed, while optic disk is extracted based on geodesic reconstruction by dilation. The obtained results are encouraging.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their method depends on the correctness of blood vessels extraction. Stapor et al [13] utilized mathematical morphology to detect the optic disc and its boundary by extraction based on geodesic reconstruction by dilation. Lowell et al [14] described a method based on a specialized correlation filter to detect approximately the center of the optic disc.…”
Section: Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their method depends on the correctness of blood vessels extraction. Stapor et al [13] utilized mathematical morphology to detect the optic disc and its boundary by extraction based on geodesic reconstruction by dilation. Lowell et al [14] described a method based on a specialized correlation filter to detect approximately the center of the optic disc.…”
Section: Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupervised approaches provide OC and OD segmentation without any learning phase. Among unsupervised state-of-the-art approaches, image processing techniques such as image thresholding or morphological operators have been frequently used to segment both OC and OD areas (Aquino et al, 2010;Stapor et al, 2004). Then, CDR calculation leads to glaucoma screening, as a binary classification between healthy and glaucomatous patients is generally operated (Singh et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Cdr-based Glaucoma Screening Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection Performance (DIARETDB0dataset) (%) Walter [30] 77.5 92.13 -Sopharak [32] 95 59.55 -Seo [33] 95 80.89 -Kande [34] 95 86.51 -Stapor [35] 87.5 78.65 -Lupascu [36] 95 88.76 -Welfer [37] 100 97.70 -Our Method 100 97.75 97.70 Table I shows the performance of the optic disc location on the DRIVE, DIARETDB0 and DIARETDB1 datasets. The performance of our method is compared with the alternative methods: Walter et al [30], Sopharak et al [32], Seo et al [33], Kande et al [34], Stapor et al [35], Lupascu et al [36] and Welfer et al [37] taken from [37]. The comparison indicates that the proposed method achieves the best performance in detecting the optic disc than alternative methods.…”
Section: B Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%