2017
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2016.2565519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation of Individual Trees From TLS and MLS Data

Abstract: Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and mobile laser scanning (MLS) data can be used to obtain abundant and precise side information of trees. Therefore, it can enable extracting individual tree parameters, such as the tree height, crown size, crown base height, and diameter at breast height, and it can provide basic data for forest research and management. This study proposes a technical framework for segmenting individual trees from TLS and MLS data. This framework contains six steps: 1) data preprocessing, 2) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
72
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Raumonen et al [10] did not provide accuracy metrics for the segmentation and used single trees segmentation in simple forest stands as pre-clustering stage for subsequent tree modelling. The good detection rates of Zhong et al [30] of more than 90% are difficult to compare and interpret, since the authors sparsely described forest characteristics of their test sites and omitted a description of the reference data. Since they explained that their algorithm does not work in vertically structured forests and because they partly used MLS data close to urban locations, it can be assumed that their accuracies related to single layered and relatively simple forest structure or even urban trees.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, Raumonen et al [10] did not provide accuracy metrics for the segmentation and used single trees segmentation in simple forest stands as pre-clustering stage for subsequent tree modelling. The good detection rates of Zhong et al [30] of more than 90% are difficult to compare and interpret, since the authors sparsely described forest characteristics of their test sites and omitted a description of the reference data. Since they explained that their algorithm does not work in vertically structured forests and because they partly used MLS data close to urban locations, it can be assumed that their accuracies related to single layered and relatively simple forest structure or even urban trees.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Raumonen et al [10] and Zhong et al [30] are among the only authors. However, Raumonen et al [10] did not provide accuracy metrics for the segmentation and used single trees segmentation in simple forest stands as pre-clustering stage for subsequent tree modelling.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To delineate small trees under canopies from airborne LiDAR data, Reitberger et al [30] introduced normalized cut (NCut), originally proposed for 2D image segmentation, and achieved a recognition rate of 12%, which is higher than conventional watershed segmentation methods. Zhong et al [31] improved the algorithm to segment overlapped trees with a correctness of above 90% by means of terrestrial and mobile LiDAR data. NCut has shown great potential in 3D segmentation and works very well when separating two overlapping objects [32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%