2018
DOI: 10.1166/jmihi.2018.2376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation of Knee Cartilage: A Comprehensive Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods commonly require the initialization, meaning that the user is required to specify certain parameters driving the segmentation process. The semi-automatic methods may be divided as follows: Intensity-based [27], thresholding, watershed [28], edge detection [29], energy minimization [30], Live Wire [31], and active contours [30,32].…”
Section: Recent Methods Of Cartilage Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods commonly require the initialization, meaning that the user is required to specify certain parameters driving the segmentation process. The semi-automatic methods may be divided as follows: Intensity-based [27], thresholding, watershed [28], edge detection [29], energy minimization [30], Live Wire [31], and active contours [30,32].…”
Section: Recent Methods Of Cartilage Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of review articles on knee joint segmentation have been published in recent years [35,36,37,38]. Aprovitola and Gallo [35] and Zhang et al [38] looked into knee bone segmentation, whereas only Zhang et al [38] covered segmentation strategies of articular cartilage, but without a quantitative comparison of the methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aprovitola and Gallo [35] and Zhang et al [38] looked into knee bone segmentation, whereas only Zhang et al [38] covered segmentation strategies of articular cartilage, but without a quantitative comparison of the methods. Other work in knee articular cartilage segmentation probed into segmentation strategies based on the level of automation and only covered a subset of methods [23,37]. Kumar et al [23] quantitatively reviewed semi-automatic and automatic methods in summary tables with limited detail and scope but lacked an analysis of results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kubicek et al. [19] and Kumar et al. [20] worked on reviewing the knee cartilage segmentation by classifying the methods into manual, semi‐automatic, and automatic.…”
Section: Related Work and Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%