Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Volume 13: 1991
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.1991.684549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation Of Magnetic Resonance Images Using A Back Propagation Artificial Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…impedance tomograms to determine cardiopulmonary function [36][37][38][39]. In fact, images need not be radiographs at all, and computed image analysis has been applied to histologic images.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…impedance tomograms to determine cardiopulmonary function [36][37][38][39]. In fact, images need not be radiographs at all, and computed image analysis has been applied to histologic images.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the regional segmentation using neural networks described above, neural network based machine learning algorithms have been used in MR image analysis for approximately 20 years. The primary utilization of neural networks has been in the area of tissue classification (Piraino et al, 1991;Clarke et al, 1993;Cagnoni et al, 1993;Lin et al, 1996a;Lin et al, 1996b;Reddick et al, 1997;Mulhern et al, 1999;Perez et al, 2003;Glass et al, 2003;Valdes-Cristerna et al, 2004;Wagenknecht et al, 2004;Shen et al, 2005;Wismuller et al, 2006, Song et al, 2006. Both supervised backpropogation as well as self organizing maps have been utilized for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, it has been of most use in the unsupervised classification of structural and functional neuroimaging data. Adequate classification of brain structure imaged using MRI has been reported for intermediate but not T2-weighted images [9] as well as for accurate estimates of grey/white matter volume [10]. In the latter study, there were differences of less than 2% for grey matter and 6% for white matter compared to experienced manual raters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%