Proceedings of the Ophthalmic Medical Image Analysis Third International Workshop 2016
DOI: 10.17077/omia.1040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation of Optic Disc and Optic Cup in Retinal Fundus Images Using Coupled Shape Regression

Abstract: Abstract. Accurate segmentation of optic cup and disc in retinal fundus images is required to derive the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) parameter which is the main indicator for Glaucoma assessment. In this paper, we propose a coupled regression method for accurate segmentation of optic cup and disc in retinal colour fundus image. The proposed coupled regression framework consists of a parameter regressor which directly predicts CDR from a given image, as well as an ensemble shape regressor which iteratively estimate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He described a method based on a fuzzy convergence voting mechanism to find the OD location (14). S.Sedai et al introduce an automatic regression based method in order to segmentation of optic cup and optic disc in retinal color fundus images (15). Handayani et al detected OD by applying Hough Transform and Active Contour Models.…”
Section: Review Of the Related Literature Optic Disk Localization Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He described a method based on a fuzzy convergence voting mechanism to find the OD location (14). S.Sedai et al introduce an automatic regression based method in order to segmentation of optic cup and optic disc in retinal color fundus images (15). Handayani et al detected OD by applying Hough Transform and Active Contour Models.…”
Section: Review Of the Related Literature Optic Disk Localization Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this comparison the F -score, which is defined as F = 2P × R/ P + R was calculated, where P is precision and R is the recall. For instance, Sedai et al [31] obtained an F -score of 0 86 using only 50 of the 101 images in the Drishti-GS1 database and Chakravarty et al [32] obtained an F -score of 0.81 using the whole Drishti-GS1 database. As in the latter, in this work, all the images in the Drishti-GS1 were used; obtaining an F -score of 0.77.…”
Section: Cup Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34,35,36,37,38,39] use CNNs and reinforcement learning for iterative registration of CT to cone-beam CT in cardiac and abdominal images. FlowNet [40,41,42,43,44,45] formulates dense optical flow estimation as a regression task using CNNs and uses it for image matching. These approaches still use a conventional model to generate the transformed image from the deformation field which increases computation time and does not fully utilize the generative capabilities of DL methods for the purpose of generating registered images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%