2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in the United States: Outcomes after resection for first primary lung cancer and treatment patterns for second primary lung cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, subgroup analyses by histology and tumor grade exhibited no difference. Similar treatment patterns were also observed between the two approaches for second primary tumors [36]. A recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing sublobar to lobar resection in stage IA NSCLC showed sublobar resection and lobectomy to have similar OS, DFS, and disease recurrence rates for stage IA NSCLC [37].…”
Section: Is Sublobar Resection Superior To Lobectomy For Stage Ia Nsc...mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Furthermore, subgroup analyses by histology and tumor grade exhibited no difference. Similar treatment patterns were also observed between the two approaches for second primary tumors [36]. A recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing sublobar to lobar resection in stage IA NSCLC showed sublobar resection and lobectomy to have similar OS, DFS, and disease recurrence rates for stage IA NSCLC [37].…”
Section: Is Sublobar Resection Superior To Lobectomy For Stage Ia Nsc...mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For a long time, lobectomy is the standard surgical procedure for stage I NSCLC ( 25 ). In recent years, some evidence has shown that segmentectomy has better outcomes than lobectomy in stage IA1-2 (T1a-bN0M0) NSCLC ( 4 6 ). However, whether this conclusion is valid in stage IA3 (T1cN0M0) NSCLC remains controversial in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in recent years, with the introduction of minimally invasive concepts, how to protect lung function as much as possible under the same survival efficacy has received attention from thoracic surgeons around the world ( 3 ). For stage IA1-2 (T1a-bN0M0) NSCLC, segmentectomy has been proven to have better perioperative efficacy, lung function protection, and noninferior survival efficacy compared with lobectomy ( 4 6 ). However, whether this conclusion is valid in stage IA3 NSCLC remains controversial in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] Some studies, such as JCOG 0802 and CALGB 140503, have shown that for patients with early-stage pulmonary nodules, the oncologic outcomes of anatomical segmentectomy are not inferior to those of traditional lobectomy. [3][4][5] Consequently, the application of anatomical segmentectomy instead of lobectomy to treat early-stage lung cancer in selected patients has been widely discussed. However, segmentectomy is technically more sophisticated than lobectomy because of the anatomical complexity and variations of peripheral vessels and bronchi, especially in the right lateral basal segment (RS9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7%), all of which were improved after conservative treatment. The median postoperative drainage time was 5(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) days, and the median length of postoperative hospital stay was 5(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) days. Final pathologies of lesions included minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) in 21 cases (77.8%) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) in 6 cases (22.2%)(Table…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%