2002
DOI: 10.1090/memo/0763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segre’s reflexivity and an inductive characterization of hyperquadrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 2) that if m > [n/2]+1, then N = n + 1 and X is itself a hyperquadric. This gives a substantial improvement to the Main Theorem 0.2 of [7], where the same claim is proved under the assumption that a general hyperquadric in the family is smooth and that m ≥ 3n/5 + 1. Our proof here, based on ideas contained in [5] and [9], is much simpler and is completely different from that in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 2) that if m > [n/2]+1, then N = n + 1 and X is itself a hyperquadric. This gives a substantial improvement to the Main Theorem 0.2 of [7], where the same claim is proved under the assumption that a general hyperquadric in the family is smooth and that m ≥ 3n/5 + 1. Our proof here, based on ideas contained in [5] and [9], is much simpler and is completely different from that in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This gives a substantial improvement to the Main Theorem 0.2 of [7], where the same claim is proved under the assumption that a general hyperquadric in the family is smooth and that m ≥ 3n/5 + 1. Our proof here, based on ideas contained in [5] and [9], is much simpler and is completely different from that in [7]. However, we should point out that a more general result, without assuming the quadric subspaces pass all through a fixed point, is proven in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Definition 1.1 (cf. also [26,31,52]) An irreducible, non-degenerate projective variety X ⊂ P N is said to be a local quadratic entry locus variety of type δ ≥ 0, briefly an LQEL-variety of type δ, if, for general x, y ∈ X distinct points and for general p ∈ x, y ⊆ S X, the union of the irreducible components of the entry locus of p passing through x and through y is a quadric hypersurface of dimension δ = δ(X ) in the given embedding X ⊂ P N . Equivalently an LQEL-variety of type δ ≥ 0 is an irreducible projective variety X ⊂ P N if through two general points there passes a quadric hypersuface of dimension δ = δ(X ) contained in X .…”
Section: Definitions Preliminary Results and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, even if X is smooth, a geometric quotient for V does not necessarily exist (see Example 2). We refer to [KS02] for a general introduction to this question and related ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%