2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12041-010-0032-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segregation distortion in F2 and doubled haploid populations of temperate japonica rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A powerful evolutionary force (Taylor and Ingvarsson, 2003), it has been reported in several crop species (Tai et al, 2000; Kumar et al, 2007; Xu et al, 2008). Segregation distortion is influenced by many factors such as mapping population, residual heterozygosity in parental lines, gametophytic competition, abortion of male or female gametes or zygotes, nonhomologous recombination, transposable elements, chromosome translocation, complementary genes, and experimental techniques (Cloutier et al, 1997; Knox and Ellis, 2002; Zhu et al, 2007; Yamagishi et al, 2010). Similar to the flax consensus map, the majority of the distorted markers clustered onto two LGs, namely LG8 and LG12, suggesting that genetic factors are more likely to have caused the distorted ratios than statistical bias or genotyping or scoring errors (Plomion et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A powerful evolutionary force (Taylor and Ingvarsson, 2003), it has been reported in several crop species (Tai et al, 2000; Kumar et al, 2007; Xu et al, 2008). Segregation distortion is influenced by many factors such as mapping population, residual heterozygosity in parental lines, gametophytic competition, abortion of male or female gametes or zygotes, nonhomologous recombination, transposable elements, chromosome translocation, complementary genes, and experimental techniques (Cloutier et al, 1997; Knox and Ellis, 2002; Zhu et al, 2007; Yamagishi et al, 2010). Similar to the flax consensus map, the majority of the distorted markers clustered onto two LGs, namely LG8 and LG12, suggesting that genetic factors are more likely to have caused the distorted ratios than statistical bias or genotyping or scoring errors (Plomion et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In barley, Segregation distortion was also reported many times (Heun et al, 1991;Goloenko et al, 2002;Li et al, 2010). Segregation distortion is influenced by many factors, such as mapping population, gametophytic competition, abortion of the male or female gametes or zygotes, non-homologous recombination, transposable element and environmental agents et al (Kinoshita, 1993;Knox and Ellis, 2002;Yamagishi et al, 2010). The development of high density molecular linkage maps provided a chance to survey the whole genome for loci showing distorted segregation (Harushima et al, 1996;Causse et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heredity Keywords: segregation distortion; cytoplasm; selection; viability; maize INTRODUCTION Segregation distortion, also called transmission ratio distortion, is the phenomenon whereby alleles at a locus deviate from the Mendelian expectation. This phenomenon has been described in many species, including maize (Lu et al, 2002), rice (Yamagishi et al, 2010), eggplant (Barchi et al, 2010), alfalfa (Li et al, 2011), mouse (Casellas et al, 2010 and drosophila (Orr and Irving, 2005;Phadnis, 2011). These alleles, also called segregation distorters, might alter the transmission ratio in specific cases and are considered selfish genetic elements that manipulate Mendelian transmission to their own advantage (Hurst and Werren, 2001;Phadnis and Orr, 2009;Werren, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%