Segregation of Brain Structural Networks Supports Spatio-Temporal Predictive Processing

Abstract

The ability to generate probabilistic expectancies regarding when and where sensory stimuli will occur, is critical to derive timely and accurate inferences about updating contexts. However, the existence of specialized neural networks for inferring predictive relationships between events is still debated. Using graph theoretical analysis applied to structural connectivity data, we tested the extent of brain connectivity properties associated with spatio-temporal predictive performance across 29 healthy subjects. Participants detected visual targets appearing at one out of three locations after one out of three intervals; expectations about stimulus location (spatial condition) or onset (temporal condition) were induced by valid or invalid symbolic cues. Connectivity matrices and centrality/segregation measures, expressing the relative importance of, and the local interactions among specific cerebral areas respect to the behavior under investigation, were calculated from whole-brain tractography and cortico-subcortical parcellation.Results: Response preparedness to cued stimuli relied on different structural connectivity networks for the temporal and spatial domains. Significant covariance was observed between centrality measures of regions within a subcortical-fronto-parietal-occipital network -comprising the left putamen, the right caudate nucleus, the left frontal operculum, the right inferior parietal cortex, the right paracentral lobule and the right superior occipital cortex-, and the ability to respond after a short cue-target delay suggesting that the local connectedness of such nodes plays a central role when the source of temporal expectation is explicit. When the potential for functional segregation was tested, we found highly clustered structural connectivity across the right superior, the left middle inferior frontal gyrus and the left caudate nucleus as related to explicit temporal orienting. Conversely, when the interaction between explicit and implicit temporal orienting processes was considered at the long interval, we found that explicit processes were related to centrality measures of the bilateral inferior parietal lobule. Degree centrality of the same region in the left hemisphere covaried with behavioral measures indexing the process of attentional re-orienting. These results represent a crucial step forward the ordinary predictive processing description, as we identified the patterns of connectivity characterizing the brain organization associated with the ability to generate and update temporal expectancies in case of contextual violations.

Linking Pathological Oscillations With Altered Temporal Processing in Parkinsons Disease: Neurophysiological Mechanisms and Implications for Neuromodulation

“…E.g., in catching a ball, joint movements, are arranged in such a way that the hand reaches the target's location at the correct time. These spatial and temporal characteristics of movement are also distinctively represented in the organization underlying cerebral motor control, embedded in both segregated and integrated neuronal circuitries (1, 2). Regarding motor timing, at least two interrelated levels of organization may be discerned:…”

Metastable States of Multiscale Brain Networks Are Keys to Crack the Timing Problem

“…Accordingly, the brain is described as a network of nodes and edges, while analytic advancements in network science and statistics allow us to represent and quantify functional interactions among brain regions of interest in order to make inferences about its organizational properties both at rest and as a function of cognitive demands. To our knowledge, a network based description of brain regions integration in timing is still largely incomplete and actually available only in Ciullo et al ( 2018b ) and Ghaderi et al ( 2018 ).…”

Brain Network Topology in Deficit and Non-Deficit Schizophrenia: Application of Graph Theory to Local and Global Indices

“…Compared to HC, SZD showed the left inferior parietal cortex as less connected to other brain regions (lower D ), even to their neighbors (lower CC node ), resulting in a less efficient information transfer (lower E loc ). The inferior parietal cortex is a multimodal association area intriguingly involved in different cognitive functions [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ], such as bottom-up attention, lower-order self-perception, undirected thinking, episodic memory, and social cognition, and such functions are notoriously impaired in SZD [ 5 ]. Moreover, several pieces of evidence showed that this area is functionally impaired in undifferentiated samples of SZ (see Torrey, 2007 for a review), being associated with negative symptoms in a functional MRI study [ 70 ], and structurally affected in a volumetric 6-year follow-up longitudinal study [ 71 ] with adolescents at risk of psychosis.…”