1993
DOI: 10.1021/ma00055a026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segregation of chain ends to polymer melt surfaces and interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interfacial area per reacting pair is s = N/(2hF 0 ), where it is taken that the end-group concentration at the interface is twice as high as in the bulk. 46 The time necessary for a particle to explore this area by diffusion equals s/(4D) = N/(8DhF 0 ) and, since both types of reactive particles are mobile, the local diffusion time…”
Section: Simulation Technique and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interfacial area per reacting pair is s = N/(2hF 0 ), where it is taken that the end-group concentration at the interface is twice as high as in the bulk. 46 The time necessary for a particle to explore this area by diffusion equals s/(4D) = N/(8DhF 0 ) and, since both types of reactive particles are mobile, the local diffusion time…”
Section: Simulation Technique and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Similarly in polymers, the molecular structure and thermodynamics at the surface differs from that of the bulk, leading to notably different phase behaviors near the surface. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Of considerable debate recently is the surface mobility of polymers. Computer simulations on polymer chains in a melt near an impenetrable wall indicated an enrichment of chain ends within two polymer segment lengths of the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument was used by Mayes [13] to predict a significant depression in the surface Tg of amorphous polymers. At the same time, the fact of such enrichment has not been strongly supported experimentally [21][22][23]. Thus, the two factors, a decrease, in the entanglement density and chain end enrichment, may contribute to a noticeable depression in the surface glass transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%