2022
DOI: 10.1002/eer2.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic analysis and test facilities of deep‐water bridges considering water–structure interaction: A state‐of‐the‐art review

Abstract: Deep‐water bridges are susceptible to severe damages under strong earthquakes. Water–structure interaction will considerably affect the dynamic performance of deep‐water bridges. In the past few decades, researchers have conducted extensive studies on the water–structure interaction and dynamic behavior of bridges through theoretical, numerical, and experimental investigations. This paper presents a comprehensive review on the calculation method for earthquake and wave‐induced hydrodynamic forces. The seismic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UST in PARI 32 UST at DUT 33 LHGF in PARI 34 UST at HHU 35 USTAS at TJU 28,29 USTAS in NFEES 31,36 Following this, a similar scaled full rigid-frame bridge model with the same scaled modeling method, as shown in Figure 5A, was utilized by Wei et al 50 to investigate the effects of water depth and superstructures on the frequencydomain dynamic responses of the bridge. Given that structures entering the yield phase may have lower tangent modulus and larger deformations, the elasticity similitude criterion may be not suitable due to the neglection of P-Δ effects.…”
Section: Ustmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…UST in PARI 32 UST at DUT 33 LHGF in PARI 34 UST at HHU 35 USTAS at TJU 28,29 USTAS in NFEES 31,36 Following this, a similar scaled full rigid-frame bridge model with the same scaled modeling method, as shown in Figure 5A, was utilized by Wei et al 50 to investigate the effects of water depth and superstructures on the frequencydomain dynamic responses of the bridge. Given that structures entering the yield phase may have lower tangent modulus and larger deformations, the elasticity similitude criterion may be not suitable due to the neglection of P-Δ effects.…”
Section: Ustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UST is an essential facility for investigations into the performance of structures under coupled earthquake and wave–current conditions 27 . The UST consists of five main parts: the wave‐making/attenuation system, the platform and supporting system, the actuation system, the hydraulic power system, and the control system 28,29 . Japan is the first country to develop USTs, and their single/double‐degree‐of‐freedom USTs can be traced back to the 1980s 30 .…”
Section: Introduction To Ustsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many researchers have presented simplified testing platforms to investigate the water influence on structures in a water environment by combining a temporarily built water tank on the shaking table 8–13 . More recently, a few sophisticated underwater shaking table systems have been developed in Japan and China 14 . These systems not only provide the seismic vibration function, but also reproduce hydrodynamic forces, wave, and current loading conditions 15–20 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13] More recently, a few sophisticated underwater shaking table systems have been developed in Japan and China. 14 These systems not only provide the seismic vibration function, but also reproduce hydrodynamic forces, wave, and current loading conditions. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Normally, the specimen in a shaking table test is scaled from real structures and the scaling process needs to follow the similitude law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%