2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-019-0499-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic analysis of dam-foundation-reservoir system including the effects of foundation mass and radiation damping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar studies were conducted using foundation mass and earthquake input for a concrete dam in one case, and in another, radiation damping and foundation mass were used as input to design two models (free-field boundary condition and domain reduction method) based on the FE method. Both models were found to be competent and accurate for FE modeling [129,130]. Another study tested pore water pressure in an earth dam to assess the mechanical stability using a 2D random FE method with Monte Carlo simulation [131].…”
Section: D Dam Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar studies were conducted using foundation mass and earthquake input for a concrete dam in one case, and in another, radiation damping and foundation mass were used as input to design two models (free-field boundary condition and domain reduction method) based on the FE method. Both models were found to be competent and accurate for FE modeling [129,130]. Another study tested pore water pressure in an earth dam to assess the mechanical stability using a 2D random FE method with Monte Carlo simulation [131].…”
Section: D Dam Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the cavitation rate, the magnitude of pressure pulsation, and performance loss increase with increasing suction head. Hydraulic turbines and types of cavitation have been described [128,129]; numerical and analytical research with theoretical studies on cavitation phenomena in hydraulic turbines have been extensively reported. Sufficient predictions for cavitation have been provided via numerical methods.…”
Section: Cavitation In the Draft Tubementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is clear, the most realistic model should include a massed foundation along with proper models of reservoir and structure. The Effects of massed foundation on the dynamic results of concrete gravity dams have been studied by many people such as Aghajanzadeh, et al [21], mohammadnezhad et al [22] and sotoudeh et al [23]. However the finite element modeling of this very important detail in the analysis is extremely complex, so, an alternative approach should be used.…”
Section: Properties and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Løkke and Chopra [31][32][33] employed the standard viscousdamper absorbing boundaries to model the semi-unbounded foundation and fluid domains and presented a direct finite element (FE) method for nonlinear response history analysis of 2D and 3D semi-unbounded dam-water-foundation systems. Mohammadnezhad et al [34] and Sotoudeh et al [35] developed a finite element model for earthquake analysis of a concrete gravity dam-foundation-reservoir system, where the viscous boundary condition is applied at the truncated foundation boundary to simulate the radiation damping of the semi-unbounded foundation rock. Karalar and Çavuşli [36][37][38] adopted the viscous boundary and viscoplastic material model to analyze the seismic response of the CFR dams under different reservoir water levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%