2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic analysis of laterally loaded pile under influence of vertical loading using finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bhattacharya et al proposed a simplified method based on a unified dynamic and buckling approach to characterize the free vibration analysis of pile supported structures in liquefiable soil, whereas Bhattacharya and Goda used probabilistic approach for buckling analysis of axially loaded piles under seismic conditions. Chatterjee et al performed pseudostatic analysis of single piles subjected to vertical and lateral loads using an analytical procedure based on finite element technique. These experimental and analytical methods enabled the formulation of various empirical correlations for computing permanent ground displacement and determination of lateral pressure exerted by the spreading soil due to liquefaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bhattacharya et al proposed a simplified method based on a unified dynamic and buckling approach to characterize the free vibration analysis of pile supported structures in liquefiable soil, whereas Bhattacharya and Goda used probabilistic approach for buckling analysis of axially loaded piles under seismic conditions. Chatterjee et al performed pseudostatic analysis of single piles subjected to vertical and lateral loads using an analytical procedure based on finite element technique. These experimental and analytical methods enabled the formulation of various empirical correlations for computing permanent ground displacement and determination of lateral pressure exerted by the spreading soil due to liquefaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum ground surface acceleration at various depths of the soil deposit, due to different earthquake motions, is multiplied by the allowable pile capacity along with the lateral load coefficient ( α ) to obtain the equivalent lateral loads ( H ) acting along the pile depth, as performed by Chatterjee et al The lateral load coefficient ( α ) may be defined as the percentage of vertical load acting at various depths along the pile length. In the present study, the lateral load coefficient is considered to remain constant along the depth of the pile for a particular problem, and parametric variation is performed by varying α as 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% for various cases, as discussed later in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the pile tip is supported on the rock, the pile tip resistance should be considered, and the bearing capacity of the pile is mainly controlled by the material strength of the pile mass [42][43][44][45][46]. Australian engineers have proposed a semi-empirical and semi-theoretical root pile design theory.…”
Section: Vertical Load Bearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yi et al [20] studied wind turbine offshore models supported by mono-pile, and found that the natural frequency was more significantly affected by the equivalent load amplitude, and the jacket-supported offshore wind turbine is more robust in terms of the consistency of the natural frequency under different equivalent load amplitudes and uncertain soil conditions, at water depths between 20 and 30 m. Durante et al [21] concluded that the complex seismic pile-soil interaction phenomenon can be efficiently investigated by testing models on a shaking table. Chatterjee et al [22] studied the seismic analysis of a laterally loaded pile applying a pseudo-static methodology and concluded that if the soil is saturated, the bending moment at the pile top is amplified by around 4 and 7.8 times (for two specific seismic motions respectively), and that with a reduction in the l/d ratio of the pile, the normalized moment at the pile head is increased while the normalized displacement is reduced. Ukritchon et al [23] concluded that in a pile group, the maximum effect happens at the corner piles and it decreases as the location of the pile gets closer to the center but increases again below the applied vertical load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%