2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic analysis of soil-pile-bridge-train interaction for isolated monorail and railway bridges under coupled lateral-vertical ground motions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The input excitations are applied to the lower boundary of the model as a shear wave of SV according to the common assumption in numerical simulations. 83,84 Figure 8 shows the design spectrum along with the 5% damped average elastic spectrum of accelerations for different records. It should be noted that as a simplification, the one-dimensional ground motion that has no varying spatial components is assumed for the bedrock excitation in this study.…”
Section: Seismic Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The input excitations are applied to the lower boundary of the model as a shear wave of SV according to the common assumption in numerical simulations. 83,84 Figure 8 shows the design spectrum along with the 5% damped average elastic spectrum of accelerations for different records. It should be noted that as a simplification, the one-dimensional ground motion that has no varying spatial components is assumed for the bedrock excitation in this study.…”
Section: Seismic Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mentioned code suggests a minimum seismic time duration (D 5 ‐D 95 ) of 10 s. The dominant periods of records range from 0.16 to 0.44 s. Other specifications of records are provided in Table 4. The input excitations are applied to the lower boundary of the model as a shear wave of SV according to the common assumption in numerical simulations 83,84 . Figure 8 shows the design spectrum along with the 5% damped average elastic spectrum of accelerations for different records.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, one way to represent the infrastructure is to describe it as a mass-spring-damper system, which consists of a well-known strategy to mathematically represent the structural behavior of LOP and the effects resulting from the application of dynamic loads on these assets. SSI models applied in bridge foundation elements usually employ independent linear springs (Wrinkler spring model) to SSI strategy [4]. Adopting a this approach to simulate the SSI effects presents advantages compared to the models with contact debonding elements [5,6], such as reduced number of attributes and lower computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative approaches are being studied to simulate the SSI effects on bridge infrastructure. Shamsi, Zakerinejad and Vakili [4] proposed a dynamic analysis in railway bridges using SSI models. The numerical modeling strategy adopted consisted of modeling the soil as a three-dimensional finite element solid with linear interpolation and Hourglass control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have also completed innovative research related to coupling loads. For example, Sham explained the seismic behavior of a new isolated monorail bridge [16]. Bucinskas introduced a vehicle simplified model, a wheel-rail nonlinear interaction model, a bridge structure finite element (FE) model, and a layered soil semi-analytical mode [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%