2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic analysis of the APR1400 nuclear reactor system using a verified beam element model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the analysis may not be considered as accurate as 3D finite element modeling, although the latter one is more time consuming. In the 3D approach, a containment building is generally modeled using either by shell or 3D brick elements [8][9][10]. In a recent approach to save time, 3D lumped mass stick models were developed and used in the literature to represent the seismic behavior of containment building [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the analysis may not be considered as accurate as 3D finite element modeling, although the latter one is more time consuming. In the 3D approach, a containment building is generally modeled using either by shell or 3D brick elements [8][9][10]. In a recent approach to save time, 3D lumped mass stick models were developed and used in the literature to represent the seismic behavior of containment building [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%