2000
DOI: 10.1029/1999jb900444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic anisotropy from local earthquakes in the transition region from a subduction to a strike‐slip plate boundary, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
80
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
21
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wittlinger et al [1998] image a low velocity zone of ∼40 km width in the upper mantle beneath the Altyn Tagh fault that they interpret as a shear zone; this result, also supported by a shear wave splitting study by Herquel et al [2004], is comparable to our observation, which hints at the presence of a ∼30 km wide shear zone beneath the NNAF. Estimates for the San Andreas fault on the other hand range from a ∼50 km shear zone (Ford et al [2014]) to a broader, ∼130 km wide, zone of shear in the upper mantle (Titus et al [2007]), more similar to what has been observed in New Zealand (Audoine et al [2000]; Wilson et al [2004]). Interestingly, as has been observed by Molnar and Dayem [2010], all of these faults appear to be bounded by a stronger block to one side and a deforming block on the other side, perhaps suggesting that the presence of heterogeneous lithosphere may favour the formation of strike slip faults.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Major Fault Zonessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Wittlinger et al [1998] image a low velocity zone of ∼40 km width in the upper mantle beneath the Altyn Tagh fault that they interpret as a shear zone; this result, also supported by a shear wave splitting study by Herquel et al [2004], is comparable to our observation, which hints at the presence of a ∼30 km wide shear zone beneath the NNAF. Estimates for the San Andreas fault on the other hand range from a ∼50 km shear zone (Ford et al [2014]) to a broader, ∼130 km wide, zone of shear in the upper mantle (Titus et al [2007]), more similar to what has been observed in New Zealand (Audoine et al [2000]; Wilson et al [2004]). Interestingly, as has been observed by Molnar and Dayem [2010], all of these faults appear to be bounded by a stronger block to one side and a deforming block on the other side, perhaps suggesting that the presence of heterogeneous lithosphere may favour the formation of strike slip faults.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Major Fault Zonessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Eberhart-Phillips and Henderson (2004) conducted Vp azimuthal-anisotropy tomography for the central New Zealand. They used the fast polarization directions from localearthquake SWS (Audoine et al, 2000) to define an initial anisotropy model. The ray paths are estimated for each of the SWS observations and the 3-D initial model is determined via an averaging process and a coherence analysis.…”
Section: New Zealandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regions of strike-slip faulting or shear have one or more layers of anisotropy with f parallel to the strike of the structures [Savage and Silver, 1993;Barruol and Hoffman, 1999;Audoine et al, 2000]. Because temperatures required to significantly modify a lattice preferred orientation of olivine under typical deviatoric stresses are generally thought to be higher than those found throughout the lithosphere [Vauchez et al, 1999], it is probable that f in cratons reflect paleoshortening directions that were fossilized during subsequent lithospheric cooling.…”
Section: Fossilized Anisotropy In the Lithosphere 431 Tanzania Cratonmentioning
confidence: 99%