“…These kernels assume a homogeneous Earth, and therefore do not include the effects of structural heterogeneity like the previously described approaches. Although the kernels could easily be extended to 3‐D, we investigate the 2‐D case here, as a first step and for the sake of simplicity and also given that many tectonic environments, for instance rifts (e.g., Armitage et al., 2015; Chambers et al., 2021, 2019; Lavayssiere et al., 2018; Rychert et al., 2012), ridges (e.g., Harmon et al., 2020, Harmon, Wang et al., 2021, 2018; Agius et al., 2021, 2018; Eakin et al., 2018; Rychert et al., 2021, 2018; Rychert et al., 2020; Saikia et al., 2021b, 2021a; Wang et al., 2020), or subduction zone trenches (e.g., Harmon et al., 2013, Harmon, Rychert et al., 2021, 2008; Chichester et al., 2020; Cooper et al., 2020; Harmon & Rychert, 2015; Rychert et al., 2008; Schlaphorst et al., 2021; Syracuse et al., 2008) are often characterized by at least some structures that are expected to be relatively 2‐D. The idea is to determine the utility of using the simplest and computationally efficient way to implement a kernel and also recover the magnitude of velocity discontinuities.…”