2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic behavior of composite connections — flexural capacity analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous investigation on the experimental behavior of H-beam-to-CFST column connections has included that of Kang et al [1], Varma et al [2], Ricles et al [3], Shin et al [4], Cheng et al [5], Wu et al [6], Nie et al [7], Wang et al [8], Park et al [9], and Qin et al [10][11]. Theoretical study on the flexural strength and shear strength has been conducted by Kawano et al [12], Koester [13], Lu et al [14], Morino et al [15], Fukumoto et al [16], Park et al [17], Jiang et al [18], Nie et al [19], Rong et al [20], and Qin et al [21][22][23]. Additionally, various connection alternatives have been proposed and explored by researchers, such as the application of blind bolt [24][25][26], combined channel angle connections [27], and through-bolt connections [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigation on the experimental behavior of H-beam-to-CFST column connections has included that of Kang et al [1], Varma et al [2], Ricles et al [3], Shin et al [4], Cheng et al [5], Wu et al [6], Nie et al [7], Wang et al [8], Park et al [9], and Qin et al [10][11]. Theoretical study on the flexural strength and shear strength has been conducted by Kawano et al [12], Koester [13], Lu et al [14], Morino et al [15], Fukumoto et al [16], Park et al [17], Jiang et al [18], Nie et al [19], Rong et al [20], and Qin et al [21][22][23]. Additionally, various connection alternatives have been proposed and explored by researchers, such as the application of blind bolt [24][25][26], combined channel angle connections [27], and through-bolt connections [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…design strength of fillet welds; ae is the calculated thickness of weld; L1 is the extending length of the vertical stiffener; hf is the fillet weld size. Previous studies [31] indicate that the ultimate flexural capacity of the connections can be calculated using the ultimate strength of steel instead of the yield strength of steel in the proposed formulas. As a result, the yield and ultimate flexural capacities of the connection considering the twist of the L-CFST column and the tensile force from the fillet welds between the vertical stiffener and the beam flange connecting plate can be calculated as shown in Eqs.…”
Section: Flexural Capacity Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nie [41] did research on the flexural capacity of connections composed of concrete-filled square steel tubular columns and steel concrete composite beams with interior diaphragms or anchored studs. Analytical models were proposed to take into account the effects of axial load, concrete slab, middle interior diaphragm, beam and column width condition, and punching shear failure mode.…”
Section: Figure 15 Beam-to-column Connection With Vertical Stiffenersmentioning
confidence: 99%