2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-016-0310-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Coupling of Short-Period Wind Noise Through Mars’ Regolith for NASA’s InSight Lander

Abstract: General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms Shield (WTS), also mounted on a tripod. Nevertheless, wind impinging on the 6 WTS will cause vibration noise, which will be transmitted to the seismometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at higher frequencies (>10 Hz), the lander-SEIS distance becomes comparable to the typical wavelengths of seismic propagations and the static deformation hypothesis may no longer be valid. Additionally, in real regolith, the behaviour is unlikely to be fully elastic and there will be some frequency dependant attenuation (Teanby et al 2016;Myhill et al 2018). As we have no frequency dependent attenuation in the elastic ground deformation model used, the amplitudes of the resonances in the observed seismic signal may be overestimated.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at higher frequencies (>10 Hz), the lander-SEIS distance becomes comparable to the typical wavelengths of seismic propagations and the static deformation hypothesis may no longer be valid. Additionally, in real regolith, the behaviour is unlikely to be fully elastic and there will be some frequency dependant attenuation (Teanby et al 2016;Myhill et al 2018). As we have no frequency dependent attenuation in the elastic ground deformation model used, the amplitudes of the resonances in the observed seismic signal may be overestimated.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their overview, Bowles (1996) quote values between 5 and 25 MPa for E in silty to loose sand and a range of 50 to 81 MPa for dense sands, though, in good agreement with values calculated here. Teanby et al (2017) also obtained low values for the effective E in the range of 1.1 to 4.4 MPa when applying elastic theory at two sites located on very loose basaltic sands in Iceland. These values are likely appropriate only for the uppermost few centimeters of the subsurface, whereas the profiles in Fig.…”
Section: Elastic Modulusmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, for 5 meter thick regolith layer with 150 ms −1 shear waves on bed rock, a first resonance might occur for about one fourth of wavelength (i.e., at about 7.5 Hz). Future work will include studying the anelastic effects that may be expected in the Martian regolith (Teanby et al 2016), and the impact of a layered sub-surface This paper currently concentrates on the [0.01-1 Hz] bandwidth as the very broad band seismometer is the critical instrument for achieving the Insight mission objectives. However, as we have seen in Section 7, the lander resonances may significantly increase the lander mechanical noise at higher frequencies and, therefore, could also impact the short-period seismometer.…”
Section: Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%