2015
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2132/12/3/465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic data two-step recovery approach combining sparsity-promoting and hyperbolic Radon transform methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the seismic data can be reconstructed as a matrix completion problem. [23][24][25] It is worth noting that continuous data corruption often occurs randomly in real-world SHM applications. The continuous missing values do not obey the common assumption of CS and low-rank matrix estimation that the matrix entries are lost uniformly at random.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the seismic data can be reconstructed as a matrix completion problem. [23][24][25] It is worth noting that continuous data corruption often occurs randomly in real-world SHM applications. The continuous missing values do not obey the common assumption of CS and low-rank matrix estimation that the matrix entries are lost uniformly at random.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%