2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-020-00994-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic demand model class uncertainty in seismic loss analysis for a code-designed URM infilled RC frame building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last few decades, different significant earthquakes of medium magnitude occurred in Italy, underlining the great vulnerability of existing buildings stock [1][2][3]. As a consequence of the occurred seismic events, relevant economic losses [4][5][6][7] and a high number of casualties were registered, pointing out the importance of the prevention activities (e.g., [8,9]) and the proper management of funds by the public administrations [10][11][12]. In light of the above, the Civil Protection Department has a key role in funds allocation in Italy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few decades, different significant earthquakes of medium magnitude occurred in Italy, underlining the great vulnerability of existing buildings stock [1][2][3]. As a consequence of the occurred seismic events, relevant economic losses [4][5][6][7] and a high number of casualties were registered, pointing out the importance of the prevention activities (e.g., [8,9]) and the proper management of funds by the public administrations [10][11][12]. In light of the above, the Civil Protection Department has a key role in funds allocation in Italy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current capacity design method, developed firstly in academic contexts for the seismic design of buildings and nowadays included in many international codes [2-4], provides criteria for designing the structural elements and constructive details for a new generation of seismic-resistant buildings. On the other hand, the high seismic vulnerability of existing buildings leads to a great economic impact [5][6][7][8]. In this context, the seismic risk assessment of the existing building heritage and the risk reduction today represent crucial points, having the same importance as the design of new buildings [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buildings 2022, 12, 872 2 of 15 Today, especially in the academic field, non-linear time-history analyses that consider bidirectional ground motion applied to 3D models of buildings are becoming more and more widespread, even if these simulations provide outcomes not always easy to interpret [16]. Moreover, there are still open issues inherent both in structural elements modelling, e.g., the beam-column joint [17,18], the definition of ground motion input [19], the intensity measure choice [20], the record-to-record variability [21], and the epistemic uncertainty due to model [8,22] and the scaling of a bidirectional ground motion [23]. In fact, in a 3D structural model, the direction of application of the seismic input can greatly affect the assessment of the seismic performance [24,25], the evaluation of seismic damage to the structure [26] and, consequently, the estimate of economic losses [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant number of casualties and economic losses registered after the last seismic events has induced many research groups to focus their attention on developing vulnerability models useful for the seismic scenario and risk assessments at large scale (Lagomarsino and Giovinazzi 2006;D'Ayala 2013;Molina Hutt et al 2019). Then, the final goal is a refined evaluation of loss assessment (Aslani and Miranda 2005;Baker and Cornell 2008;Romano et al 2018Romano et al , 2021, for allocating the repair costs (Ramirez et al 2012;Di Ludovico et al 2017b;Del Vecchio et al 2020) and the optimization of retrofit strategies (Polese et al 2018;D'Amato et al 2020;Ferracuti et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%