Monitoring the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Seismic Event Discrimination and Identification 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8169-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Discrimination of the May 11, 1998 Indian Nuclear Test with Short-period Regional Data from Station NIL (Nilore, Pakistan)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The station NIL was one of the few regional distance stations to record the May 11, 1998 Indian nuclear test. Previously Rodgers and Walter [2002] have demonstrated that P/S ratios discriminate this test from nearby earthquakes down to lower frequencies than usual, including the 1–2 Hz band where the new regional phase attenuation maps are available. Rodgers and Walter [2002] also showed that earthquakes to the north of NIL did not discriminate well using 1–2 Hz P/S ratio and simple one‐dimensional path corrections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The station NIL was one of the few regional distance stations to record the May 11, 1998 Indian nuclear test. Previously Rodgers and Walter [2002] have demonstrated that P/S ratios discriminate this test from nearby earthquakes down to lower frequencies than usual, including the 1–2 Hz band where the new regional phase attenuation maps are available. Rodgers and Walter [2002] also showed that earthquakes to the north of NIL did not discriminate well using 1–2 Hz P/S ratio and simple one‐dimensional path corrections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Previously Rodgers and Walter [2002] have demonstrated that P/S ratios discriminate this test from nearby earthquakes down to lower frequencies than usual, including the 1–2 Hz band where the new regional phase attenuation maps are available. Rodgers and Walter [2002] also showed that earthquakes to the north of NIL did not discriminate well using 1–2 Hz P/S ratio and simple one‐dimensional path corrections. They achieved better results using a spatial correction technique based on Bayesian kriging [e.g., Schultz et al , 1998], but this still requires reference earthquakes in the vicinity of the explosion for proper identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High frequency P/S ratios (>2 Hz) for IND 980511 indicate that the disturbance is an outlier to the earthquake population defined by common regional phase-ratio discriminants, such as P n /L g and P n /S n . Interestingly, these discriminants also seem effective at frequencies as low as 0.5-2.0 Hz (Rodgers & Walter 2002).…”
Section: Indian Underground Test Of May 11 1998mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Alternatively, various P/S ratios can be formed from the regional P phases P n , P g , and S phases S n , L g , either in common or different (cross-spectral) passbands for P and S. It may be that for a particular region a certain combination offers the most promising discriminant (Walter et al 1995, Fan et al 2002, Rodgers & Walter 2002, or a number of combinations are to be considered as part of an outlier detection strategy (Fisk et al 1996).…”
Section: Regional P/s Amplitude Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%