1992
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1251)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic‐Energy Dissipation in MDOF Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
88
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In the history of seismic-resistant design of building structures, the earthquake input energy has played an important role together with deformation and acceleration [for example, Housner (1959[for example, Housner ( , 1975, Berg and Thomaides (1960), Housner and Jennings (1975), Zahrah and Hall (1984), Akiyama (1985), and Leger and Dussault (1992)]. While deformation and acceleration can predict and evaluate the performance of a building structure mainly for serviceability, the energy can evaluate the performance of a building structure mainly for safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the history of seismic-resistant design of building structures, the earthquake input energy has played an important role together with deformation and acceleration [for example, Housner (1959[for example, Housner ( , 1975, Berg and Thomaides (1960), Housner and Jennings (1975), Zahrah and Hall (1984), Akiyama (1985), and Leger and Dussault (1992)]. While deformation and acceleration can predict and evaluate the performance of a building structure mainly for serviceability, the energy can evaluate the performance of a building structure mainly for safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A structure is considered to resist an earthquake ground motion provided that the energy input to the structure from the earthquake is lower than its energy absorption capacity. Following this, the EBD concept as well as the determination of elastic and/or hysteretic energy distributions were examined for MDOF systems (Berg and Thomaides, 1960;Penzien, 1960;Zahrah and Hall, 1982;Akiyama, 1985;Nakamura and Yamane, 1986;Léger and Dussault, 1992;Rodriguez, 1994;Nakashima et al, 1996;Connor et al, 1997). Chou and Uang (2003) presented a procedure for the distribution of seismic energy demand over the floors of a MDOF system solely by modal superposition of energy shapes, which are established from a static pushover analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inappropriate damping assumptions may lead to extravagantly unrealistic responses that considerably di er from the real responses of the buildings [42]. Perform-3D software is able to implement Rayleigh damping as well as modal damp- ing [41].…”
Section: Nonlinear Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%