2014
DOI: 10.1002/stc.1677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic evaluation and structural control of the historical Beylerbeyi Palace

Abstract: Summary The Beylerbeyi Palace was built between 1861 and 1865 on the Asian shore of Istanbul, and it is within the cultural heritage treasury of the world. Recent earthquakes in the Mediterranean basin have highlighted the particular vulnerability of historic masonry buildings and the need of properly defining retrofitting measures. In this respect, structural behaviour and the earthquake performance of the palace have been investigated. It is seen that the inherent dynamic properties of the palace make it vul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their high seismic vulnerability can be attributed mainly to the very low tensile strength of masonry, very small capacity to dissipate energy, inadequate connections between structural elements, poor out-of-plane capacity, presence of flexible floors/roofs and deterioration of materials over time [6][7]. A reliable seismic performance assessment of historical masonry constructions represents a fundamental step for the adoption of appropriate strategies aimed at reducing their seismic vulnerability and preserving the cultural and artistic value of the built heritage: for such reasons, the seismic assessment of masonry monumental buildings is currently a topic of great interest [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Several approaches and analysis methods can be used to evaluate the structural behavior of masonry structures, comprising simplified procedures based on structural macro-elements, limit analysis, discrete element (DE) method and micro-modelling or macro-modelling based on the finite element (FE) method [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their high seismic vulnerability can be attributed mainly to the very low tensile strength of masonry, very small capacity to dissipate energy, inadequate connections between structural elements, poor out-of-plane capacity, presence of flexible floors/roofs and deterioration of materials over time [6][7]. A reliable seismic performance assessment of historical masonry constructions represents a fundamental step for the adoption of appropriate strategies aimed at reducing their seismic vulnerability and preserving the cultural and artistic value of the built heritage: for such reasons, the seismic assessment of masonry monumental buildings is currently a topic of great interest [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Several approaches and analysis methods can be used to evaluate the structural behavior of masonry structures, comprising simplified procedures based on structural macro-elements, limit analysis, discrete element (DE) method and micro-modelling or macro-modelling based on the finite element (FE) method [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the part of the structure over the elastomeric devices, and substructure, i.e. other part remains under the separation line (Aras & Altay, 2015). The stiffness of the bearings is expected to dominate the dynamic behaviour of the superstructure and provides an elongated period set for the reduction of the seismic forces.…”
Section: Studied Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas Dynamic monitoring is adopted to quantify and assess the system dynamic properties. [5][6][7][8][9][10] The aim of SHM is to determine a structure's reaction when subjected to any type of excitation or a seismic activity, by means of identifying modifications in basic vibration measurements and modal parameters. Natural frequencies, damping and mode shapes are considered the most important modal parameters to evaluate in order characterize the system state [11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%