Recent Advances in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering and Microzonation
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2528-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Microzonation: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil amplification values calculated according to Midorikawa (1987) vary between 1.5 and 2.30. On the other hand, the ground dominant periods (T 0 and MT 0 ) calculated from Vs30 and directly determined by MT (HVSR) are generally consistent, except for Malatya-1 and 2 profiles, and vary between 0.12 and 0.40 s. When evaluated according to Ansal et al (2001Ansal et al ( , 2004, these values indicate that the soil amplification and soil dominant vibration periods in the study areas are at low-medium levels. Moreover, for the soil dominant vibration period values according to Kanai and Tanaka (1961), it is defined as "rockstiff sandy gravel units" and/or "alluvium consisting of sandy-gravelly stiff clay" and is in harmony with soil classifications based on velocities obtained from seismic profiles.…”
Section: Evaluation and Interpretation Of Profilesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Soil amplification values calculated according to Midorikawa (1987) vary between 1.5 and 2.30. On the other hand, the ground dominant periods (T 0 and MT 0 ) calculated from Vs30 and directly determined by MT (HVSR) are generally consistent, except for Malatya-1 and 2 profiles, and vary between 0.12 and 0.40 s. When evaluated according to Ansal et al (2001Ansal et al ( , 2004, these values indicate that the soil amplification and soil dominant vibration periods in the study areas are at low-medium levels. Moreover, for the soil dominant vibration period values according to Kanai and Tanaka (1961), it is defined as "rockstiff sandy gravel units" and/or "alluvium consisting of sandy-gravelly stiff clay" and is in harmony with soil classifications based on velocities obtained from seismic profiles.…”
Section: Evaluation and Interpretation Of Profilesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…It was found that areas in the north eastern and south eastern parts of the city, with silty and clayey sand formations, have comparatively high predominant frequencies (> 4 Hz 1985, Loma Prieta 1989, Northridge 1994, Kobe 1995, Bhuj 2001, Tohoku 2011and Christchurch 2011. Local soil conditions play a significant role in the amplification of seismic waves (Street et al, 2001;Slob et al, 2002;Ansal et al, 2004). Amplification depends on the frequency of the ground motion, and younger softer soils generally amplify the ground motion more than older more competent soils or bedrock (Aki, 1993).…”
Section: Estimation Of Local Site Effects Using Microtremor Testing Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, formations consisting of compact and massive materials demonstrate minimal amplification or may experience wave deamplification. The phenomenon of amplification has been observed in destructive earthquakes worldwide, such as the Michoacan earthquake in Mexico (1985), Kalamata in Greece (1989), Loma Prieta in California, USA (1989), Roodbar-Manjil in Iran (1990), Kocaeli and Duzce in Turkey (1999), Chi-Chi in Taiwan (1999), Bam in Iran (2003), and Wenchuan in China (2008) [10]. This highlights the influence of lithology and rock age on seismic vulnerability in the Opak River area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%