2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13296-013-4003-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic performance of buckling-restrained braced frames with varying beam-column connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also mentioned that the reason for using masonry walls is to reduce drift in frames equipped with buckling restrained braces. Fayeq et al [17] investigated the seismic performance of frames with buckling restrained braces with changes in beam-to-column connections. Kiggins et al [18] examined residual drift in frames with buckling restrained braces as a dual system.…”
Section: Figure 1 Ideal Stress-strain Behavior Of Superelastic Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also mentioned that the reason for using masonry walls is to reduce drift in frames equipped with buckling restrained braces. Fayeq et al [17] investigated the seismic performance of frames with buckling restrained braces with changes in beam-to-column connections. Kiggins et al [18] examined residual drift in frames with buckling restrained braces as a dual system.…”
Section: Figure 1 Ideal Stress-strain Behavior Of Superelastic Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the structure is conventionally evaluated based on Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) 28 and the comparison between their demand values and acceptance criteria (also referred to as capacity limits). Most research studies focusing on fragility assessment (e.g., 6, 7, 9, 29) consider global EDPs, as they allow estimating structural and non‐structural damage states with relatively low computational efforts. Among others, the inter‐storey drift ratio (IDR) is a widely adopted global EDP, as it is used as a proxy to synthetically describe the local damage in the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ariyaratana and Fahnestock [15] noted that the reserve strength provided by the moment-resisting connections within a BRBF and/or an SMRF, in parallel with the BRBF used to create a dual system configuration, played a critical role in the residual displacement response and soft-story mechanism of BRBFs. Similarly, Ghowsi and Sahoo [16] investigated the effect of beam-column connections on the overall seismic response of a medium-rise BRBF. Sahoo and Chao [17] proposed a stiffness-based design for BRBFs to control the residual interstory drifts by increasing the elastic story stiffness using column sections with a higher moment of inertia, which is essentially a dual system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%