2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic performance of different chevron braced frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the seismic performance of braced frames with bearing force beams caused by braces is 33% similar to braced frames designed by current regulations. Zheng et al (2023) evaluated the seismic performance of different Chevron braced frames. This study proposed an arched chevron braced frame, a multi-line chevron braced frame and side bar braced frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results showed that the seismic performance of braced frames with bearing force beams caused by braces is 33% similar to braced frames designed by current regulations. Zheng et al (2023) evaluated the seismic performance of different Chevron braced frames. This study proposed an arched chevron braced frame, a multi-line chevron braced frame and side bar braced frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that KBFs equipped with steel or NiTi BRBs can satisfy the desired drift well. Zheng et al (2023) investigated the seismic performance of multi-story X-braced steel frames. The analysis showed that the bracing of the multi-story steel frame with X bracing does not experience instability and the lateral load capacity increases by 20%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their last study, a polyline chevron-braced frame (ZXC ), a lateral rod chevron-braced frame (ZCG), an arc-shaped chevronbraced frame (HZC), and Chevron-braced frames were designed to decrease the unbalanced force and vertical deformation at the brace junction by Zheng et al Simultaneously, bearing capacity decay, hysteresis accomplishment, monotonic loading accomplishment, failure mode, fracture trend, energy dissipation volume, and vertical displacement at the brace point junction of the ZCG, ZXC, and HZC were investigated. These were then contrasted with the chevron braced frames [19]. In the present research, seven accelerograms were selected by reviewing the studies done on steel frames with Chevron and Zipper bracing systems having pinned and rigid connections and studies conducted on tall steel frames with semi-rigid connections, as well as the results obtained from previous research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%