2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40996-016-0034-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Performance of Different Types of Connections Between Steel Bracing and RC Frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, a similar response is indicated for dampening interfaces for masonry infills, as reported in [12]. The three different configurations of an X-brace connection are also treated in [11] based on numerical analyses, which exhibit similarly robust characteristics. Of particular interest is the proposal by [14] for the introduction of Buckling-Restraint-Braces (BRB), since the connection details are formed with post-installed anchorages, and tests are carried out in real scale.…”
Section: Retrofitting Of Existing Concrete Frame Structuresapplicatiosupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Besides, a similar response is indicated for dampening interfaces for masonry infills, as reported in [12]. The three different configurations of an X-brace connection are also treated in [11] based on numerical analyses, which exhibit similarly robust characteristics. Of particular interest is the proposal by [14] for the introduction of Buckling-Restraint-Braces (BRB), since the connection details are formed with post-installed anchorages, and tests are carried out in real scale.…”
Section: Retrofitting Of Existing Concrete Frame Structuresapplicatiosupporting
confidence: 56%