Seismic performance of GFRP tube concrete-encased steel composite columns under axial compression

Zhang, Haixia; Ju, Shilong; Chen, Huan

doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107641

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The steel ratio has a significant impact on the energy dissipation and load carrying capacity of the column. Finally, the study establishes and verifies a simplified hysteretic restoring force model for the load-displacement relationship of such columns [5]. Based on a current study to understand the uniaxial performance evaluation of composite CFST columns, special emphasis is paid on the impact of adding steel fibers and various cross-section shapes such as circular, rectangular, and octagonal cross-sections.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

A comparative study on steel‐concrete composite columns for use in RC Tall Buildings in Seismic Areas

Mert,

Celik

2023

ce papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Usable/rentable floor areas are crucial for the building owners in reinforced concrete (RC) tall buildings. To address this issue, concrete‐encased (CE) or concrete‐filled (CF) composite columns are proposed as alternative vertical load carrying elements by providing the required strength and ductility, but with smaller dimensions. Comparing the performance of columns with different configurations can be done using moment (M)‐axial load (N) interaction curves. This paper summarizes the approaches proposed by Eurocode 4 and AISC 360‐16 for both types of composite columns, presenting simplified and true curves for a specific class of sections. Two case studies involving hybrid RC tall buildings in Istanbul, which utilized composite columns, are presented along with a comparison with steel‐concrete composite and RC solutions. Numerical results indicate that employing steel‐concrete composite columns resulted in approximately 24% reduction in total cross‐sectional areas for one of the case studies, leading to increased usable/rentable areas. Additionally, concrete‐encased and concrete‐filled composite columns exhibited similar performance in terms of axial load‐moment capacities. The impact of longitudinal rebar ratios is also investigated, revealing that the AISC 360‐16 approach yields smaller bending moments and compression capacities compared to Eurocode 4 due to the significant strength reduction factor considered in calculating the concrete contribution in composite sections.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%