Seismic performance of reinforced concrete structures with pushover analysis

Pierre, Andrew John; Hidayat, Irpan

doi:10.1088/1755-1315/426/1/012045

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…al. 2020 [14] This focuses on Building A, which appears strong enough to potentially collapse under seismic loads. Earthquake-resistant design is usually based on the analysis of elastic structures assigned a load factor to simulate extreme conditions.…”

Section: IVmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seismic Performance of RC Structure by considering Different Orientation and Classes of Building: A Review

Das,

Denge

2023

IJRASET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the framework of this project, an attempt was made to find out the influence of the shape, size and direction of the rectangular columns of the construction plan on the general stiffness and seismic response of the building suffering from the earthquake. A multistory RC building is modeled using ETABS software with different column shapes (square and rectangular), column sizes (different cross-sectional area at building height), and column orientations to determine the effect of each on the stiffness and seismic response of the building. . . The analytical results of each model were compared in terms of base movement, overburden displacement, layer deflection and time period.

show abstract

Section: IVmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seismic Performance of RC Structure by considering Different Orientation and Classes of Building: A Review

Das,

Denge

2023

IJRASET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Salah satu faktor yang memengaruhi struktur dalam menerima beban yaitu konfigurasi struktur, dimana bangunan yang berkonfigurasi teratur lebih baik dalam menahan gaya gempa sehingga kerusakan struktur dapat dihindari [1] [2]. Selain itu, besarnya gaya gempa juga memengaruhi respons struktur yang terjadi diakibatkan karena gaya gempa akan diterima oleh dasar bangunan [3] [4].…”

Section: Wilayahunclassified

Analisis Respons dan Kinerja Struktur Bangunan Gedung Menggunakan Pushover Analysis

Usman

Rosidawani

Mutmainna³

2021

SAINTIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[ID] Indonesia merupakan negara dengan resiko gempa tinggi, hal ini diakibatkan oleh pertemuan lempeng-lempeng tektonik utama dan lempeng kecil lainnya yang mengelilingi Indonesia. Setiap wilayah indonesia memiliki tingkat resiko gempa yang berbeda-beda, mulai dari resiko gempa rendah hingga resiko gempa tinggi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbandingan respons dan kinerja struktur suatu bangunan gedung di beberapa wilayah yang mewakili tingkat resiko gempa rendah hingga tinggi. Adapun wilayah-wilayah yang ditinjau dalam penelitian ini yaitu wilayah Pontianak, Palembang, Jakarta, Bandar Lampung, dan Palu. Analisis dilakukan pada bangunan beton bertulang empat lantai dengan dinding geser dengan menggunakan bantuan program SAP 2000 guna mendapatkan repons dan kinerja struktur. Hasil respons struktur dari penelitian menunjukkan nilai simpangan lateral lantai dari yang terbesar hingga terkecil yaitu dimulai dari wilayah Palu, Bandar Lampung, Jakarta, Palembang, dan Pontianak. Wilayah Palu memiliki nilai simpangan lateral lantai yang terbesar yaitu 23,745 mm dan 23,690 mm untuk arah X dan Y sedangkan wilayah Pontianak memiliki nilai simpangan lateral lantai terkecil dengan besar simpangan lateral 7,571 mm dan 7,439 mm untuk arah X dan Y. Berdasarkan analisis pushover didapatkan level kinerja struktur memiliki level kinerja B untuk Wilayah Palu dan IO untuk wilayah lainnya. [EN] Indonesia is a country with a high risk of earthquake due to the meeting of the main tectonic plates and other small plates that surround Indonesia. Each area in this country has a different level of earthquake risk, ranging from low to high earthquake risk. This study aims to compare the response and structural performance of buildings in some areas with low to high earthquake risk levels. The areas covered Pontianak, Palembang, Jakarta, Bandar Lampung, and Palu. The analysis was carried out on a four-story reinforced concrete with shear walls using the SAP 2000 program to obtain the response and performance of the building structure. The results of the structural response showed the value of the floor lateral deviation from the largest to the smallest, starting from Palu, Bandar Lampung, Jakarta, Palembang, and Pontianak. Pulu has the largest floor lateral deviation values of 23.745 mm and 23.690 mm for the X and Y directions, while Pontianak has the smallest floor lateral deviation values of 7.571 mm and 7.439 mm for the X and Y directions. Based on the pushover analysis, the structure has a performance level of B for Palu areas and IO for other areas.

show abstract

“…In modern places, architectural deviation is a common occurrence. However, when the building gets more irregular, earthquakes become more dangerous [22] [23]. Seismology, earthquake maps, levels and types of damage, and the performance of earthquakeresistant building systems are all new views provided by these new quakes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessments of the Vulnerability and Demand Capacity Ratio of Old Public Buildings Structures

Nurchasanah,

Rochman,

Ujianto

et al. 2024

E3S Web of Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The collapse of buildings during seismic shocks resulted in many fatalities due to the earthquake. Existing structures constructed under previous regulations with an earthquake intensity value less than the present seismic intensity are the most affected, particularly low-rise buildings. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) releases codes to evaluate the vulnerability of buildings to earthquakes to anticipate the possibility of damage to existing structures caused by earthquakes. According to the FEMA P154-2015 code, in the regulation, there are stages consisting of Tier 1 (screening), Tier 2 (evaluation), and Tier 3 (detailed), as well as building evaluation with the Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) approach. The vulnerability of twelve existing buildings in Surakarta and Yogyakarta Indonesia has been assessed, those are low-rise buildings (2-3 floors) that were built around 1980 and still stand as public facilities. The evaluation result of existing buildings with the RVS method, eight buildings are declared safe against earthquakes (S≥2) and four buildings are considered vulnerable to earthquakes (S<2). Evaluation for those four buildings should proceed to the Tier 2 evaluation. One of the school buildings in Surakarta was evaluated under Tier 2. The evaluation was conducted with Static Linear Elastic Procedures (LESP) and Linear Elastic Dynamic Procedures (LEDP).

show abstract

Seismic performance of reinforced concrete structures with pushover analysis

Cited by 7 publications

References 1 publication

Seismic Performance of RC Structure by considering Different Orientation and Classes of Building: A Review

Seismic Performance of RC Structure by considering Different Orientation and Classes of Building: A Review

Analisis Respons dan Kinerja Struktur Bangunan Gedung Menggunakan Pushover Analysis

Assessments of the Vulnerability and Demand Capacity Ratio of Old Public Buildings Structures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About