Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COM 2019
DOI: 10.7712/120119.7118.19486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Protection of Statues. A Case Study

Abstract: The analysis of rocking behaviour is a key aspect of safety assessment the maintenance of artifacts, like statues vases, since the rocking itself can be the cause of damage at the base of the object, due to impact with the support. By seismic excitation, a freestanding object may in fact enter a rocking state which would cause overturning, so that often the sliding is desirable, given the possibility of evaluating relative displacements to avoid collisions. In the majority of cases, museum exhibitions are not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Housner basic assumption for the rocking motion is however an infinite friction coefficient between the two contact surfaces. In real cases, and especially when the protection of statues and other cultural heritage objects is involved [16,17], and in all the cases in which the rocking motion is not an option and should be avoided [18,19] the rough hypothesis of infinite friction coefficient must be removed. Leaving apart the discussion about the possibility of passive or active protection systems [20,21], in all the cases in which isolation systems cannot be used, such low weight of the object to be protected, high financial commitment of the protection, a deep investigation on the real friction values should be performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Housner basic assumption for the rocking motion is however an infinite friction coefficient between the two contact surfaces. In real cases, and especially when the protection of statues and other cultural heritage objects is involved [16,17], and in all the cases in which the rocking motion is not an option and should be avoided [18,19] the rough hypothesis of infinite friction coefficient must be removed. Leaving apart the discussion about the possibility of passive or active protection systems [20,21], in all the cases in which isolation systems cannot be used, such low weight of the object to be protected, high financial commitment of the protection, a deep investigation on the real friction values should be performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%