2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-019-01389-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic protection technologies for timber structures: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This offers the possibility of fully harnessing the dissipative potential of seismic dampers. In this context, energy dampers have been tested on wood-frame shear walls under different configurations (Ugalde et al 2019): Filiatrault (1990) and Li et al (2017) tested walls with frictional dissipators, Dinehart et al (1999) tested walls with viscoelastic dissipators, Higgins (2001) tested yield dissipators, and Symans et al (2002a) and Dutil and Symans (2004) investigated viscous fluid dampers using typical diagonal and chevron configurations, as shown in Figure 1. However, all previous applications of energy dissipators in wood-frame shear walls are based on the straight transmission of displacements from the wall to the dissipator.…”
Section: Brief Literature Review Of Seismic Protection Systems With Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This offers the possibility of fully harnessing the dissipative potential of seismic dampers. In this context, energy dampers have been tested on wood-frame shear walls under different configurations (Ugalde et al 2019): Filiatrault (1990) and Li et al (2017) tested walls with frictional dissipators, Dinehart et al (1999) tested walls with viscoelastic dissipators, Higgins (2001) tested yield dissipators, and Symans et al (2002a) and Dutil and Symans (2004) investigated viscous fluid dampers using typical diagonal and chevron configurations, as shown in Figure 1. However, all previous applications of energy dissipators in wood-frame shear walls are based on the straight transmission of displacements from the wall to the dissipator.…”
Section: Brief Literature Review Of Seismic Protection Systems With Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors assumed that wood-frame walls dissipate much energy through the framing-to-sheathing connection. Therefore, no additional energy dissipation systems are considered necessary (Ugalde et al 2019). However, this idealized high energy dissipation is not real because of the pinching effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advancement in earthquake engineering has led to the development of seismic resilient construction technologies that employ passive control systems to withstand strong earthquakes with limited structural damages (Ríos-García and Benavent-Climent 2020). A number of successful building projects utilizing mass-timber components is spreading in recent years thanks to their optimal strength-weight ratio, with important economic, social, environmental benefits and reduced construction time (Loss et al 2018;Ugalde et al 2019). Among the various structural low-damage solutions for medium and high-rise multistorey timber buildings located in high seismic risk area, moment-resistant timber frame (Polocoșer et al 2018), platform frame or cross laminated timber (CLT) constructions (Ceccotti et al 2013;Van de Lindt et al 2018;Masaeli et al 2020;Chen et al 2020) are emerging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of seismic protection systems, such as dissipative devices (Di Cesare and Mazza and Mazza, 2019) and/or rocking systems (Ponzo et al, 2012;Wang and Zhu, 2018), reduces seismic demand and/or increases the lateral capacity of structures, minimizing residual drift, and structural damage. It has been proved that timber structures have the capacity to withstand strong earthquakes without collapsing due to the light weight of wood material, elastic deformation capacity, and ductility of connections (Ugalde et al, 2019). Conventional wooden buildings are usually regular and the seismic resisting structures are shear walls with ductile foundation anchorages designed against the base shear force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, design values are suggested within the design code depending on structural types or governed by allowable material strain limits. Recently, the application of the DBD method has been extended toward the design of timber buildings (Ugalde et al, 2019), such as CLT shear walls (Di Cesare et al, 2019a), coupled timber walls (Newcombe et al, 2011), and post-tensioned timber frames without and with the addition of dissipative rocking systems (Newcombe et al, 2010;Di Cesare et al, 2012Pei et al, 2012). However, DBD applications to timber-framed buildings remain largely unexplored, and new techniques are still being investigated aiming to minimize residual damage induced by earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%