1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-4730(96)00024-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic reliability of electric power networks: methodology and application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An FF, in its simplest form, quantifies the stochastic uncertainty related to the damage event of interest (eg, [42]). Values of such an FF may be viewed as results of propagating stochastic uncertainty.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An FF, in its simplest form, quantifies the stochastic uncertainty related to the damage event of interest (eg, [42]). Values of such an FF may be viewed as results of propagating stochastic uncertainty.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the fragilities of the macro components are expressed as a function of the soil acceleration, conversion from MM intensity to acceleration in cm/s is needed; the empirical law [21] a(cm/s)"10' > (10) has been used. The (deterministic) attenuation value in Equation (10), has again been considered to be the mean value of a lognormal random variable with coe$cient of variation .…”
Section: Model Of the Seismic Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fujisaki et al 2014). Vanzi (1996) and Hwang and Huo (1998) only consider the fragility of substations. The SYNER-G project (Cavalieri et al 2014b) proposes a methodology for assessing the overall performance of an electrical power system, but in doing so makes the assumption that conduits are not vulnerable to direct physical damage and so damage potential is limited to substations and generation plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%