71st EAGE Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2009 2009
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201400421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Repeatability – Is There a Limit?

Abstract: The results of a 13-day seismic monitoring experiment are presented. It consists in 2 permanent piezoelectric sources, one cemented in depth and the other attached to a surface concrete pad and 28 sensors, 14 at the surface and 14 cemented below the weathering zone. To enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, continuous averaging of the individual SP records is performed providing an average daily SP. 4D attributes are measured on these daily averages. The best repeatability is obtained when both sources and sensors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For that reason, it is preferred to use buried sources and receivers to avoid the seasonally varying near surface (Schisselé et al 2009), which can mask the true reservoir time-lapse signal. For that reason, it is preferred to use buried sources and receivers to avoid the seasonally varying near surface (Schisselé et al 2009), which can mask the true reservoir time-lapse signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, it is preferred to use buried sources and receivers to avoid the seasonally varying near surface (Schisselé et al 2009), which can mask the true reservoir time-lapse signal. For that reason, it is preferred to use buried sources and receivers to avoid the seasonally varying near surface (Schisselé et al 2009), which can mask the true reservoir time-lapse signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier work by Pullin et al (1987) showed that acquiring seismic by burying geophones 10 m below the surface result in high signal-to-noise ratio data compared to seismic data recorded from surface. More recently, Schissele et al (2009) and Bakulin et al (2012) presented tests of land acquisition where sources and/or receivers are buried below the weathering zone. In the case presented by Schissele et al (2009), the best repeatability was obtained by burying both sources and receivers below the weathering zone.…”
Section: Acquisition Repeatabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Schissele et al (2009) and Bakulin et al (2012) presented tests of land acquisition where sources and/or receivers are buried below the weathering zone. In the case presented by Schissele et al (2009), the best repeatability was obtained by burying both sources and receivers below the weathering zone. The feasibility test presented by Bakulin et al (2012) demonstrated that burying receivers below the weathering zone and using surface sources significantly improved time-lapse repeatability.…”
Section: Acquisition Repeatabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 17b measurements was estimated at less than 10 μs for a buried source and buried receivers (Schissele et al, 2009).…”
Section: Saint-clair-sur-epte (2002-2004)mentioning
confidence: 99%