2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic resonant metamaterials for the protection of an elastic-plastic SDOF system against vertically propagating seismic shear waves (SH) in nonlinear soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the data-informed CNN method would consider the soil's nonlinear behavior during data generation for training as the DRM is capable of modeling nonlinearities. 46 This method can aid decision-makers in quickly assessing the structural integrity of infrastructure after an earthquake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, the data-informed CNN method would consider the soil's nonlinear behavior during data generation for training as the DRM is capable of modeling nonlinearities. 46 This method can aid decision-makers in quickly assessing the structural integrity of infrastructure after an earthquake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented method could also be extended to consider the nonlinearity of soils, given that near‐surface soils can exhibit nonlinear response behavior during moderate and strong earthquakes. Accordingly, the data‐informed CNN method would consider the soil's nonlinear behavior during data generation for training as the DRM is capable of modeling nonlinearities 46 . This method can aid decision‐makers in quickly assessing the structural integrity of infrastructure after an earthquake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the critical vibration mode of the reactor vessel is at 20 Hz, the horizontal springs of the resonant metamaterials are tuned to horizontal vibration frequency f m = 19 Hz. As shown in [4], in this way they are expected to oscillate out-of-phase with the soil at the critical excitation frequency of 20 Hz, exerting opposite forces that reduce soil response, and, hence, the response of the structure.…”
Section: Resonant Metamaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an encouraging result, given the fact that the total resonating mass of the metamaterials is only 4.3% of the NPP reactor building's mass. As shown in [4], to achieve a meaningful response reduction for the lower frequency vibration modes of a structure (near 2 Hz), the total metamaterial mass should be comparable to the mass of the structure. However, in the higher frequency range that is studied here, the participation mass of the structure is dramatically reduced compared to the lower-frequency vibration modes, allowing for a smaller metamaterial−reactor mass ratio of just 4.3%.…”
Section: Sh Wave Sweep Signal (1−35 Hz)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation