2014
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.580-583.1755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Response Analysis for Assembled Precast Concrete Residence

Abstract: Assembled precast concrete structure is composed of precast element, which needs to be assembled and connected as the main force component. It is propitious to the development of building industrialization, enhancing production efficiency and promoting green building. Seismic response of a 6 storey assembled precast concrete residence was analyzed based on finite element software ANSYS. The results show that stiffness of assembled precast concrete residence is larger, and all of interbedded drift angles comply… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the skeleton curves was shown in Figure 32. It can be seen from the comparison of the skeleton curves [18] that the experimental values were close to the simulated values, that the simulated peak load was larger than the experimental peak load, and that the slopes of the curves when the two specimens were simulated under negative load were greater than the slopes in the tests. At the beginning, they were in the elastic phase, the curves approximately appeared as straight lined, and then they entered the yield stage, and the curves bent.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Finite Element Simulation Andmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison of the skeleton curves was shown in Figure 32. It can be seen from the comparison of the skeleton curves [18] that the experimental values were close to the simulated values, that the simulated peak load was larger than the experimental peak load, and that the slopes of the curves when the two specimens were simulated under negative load were greater than the slopes in the tests. At the beginning, they were in the elastic phase, the curves approximately appeared as straight lined, and then they entered the yield stage, and the curves bent.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Finite Element Simulation Andmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In this test, the comparison figure of the skeleton curve [18] of the relationship between horizontal load and vertex displacement of the two T-shaped wallboards was as follows.…”
Section: Skeleton Curve Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%