2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9061201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Response of High-Rise Buildings Equipped with Base Isolation and Non-Traditional Tuned Mass Dampers

Abstract: One of the methods in structural control is the application of combinational control systems in order to reduce the response of structures during earthquakes. The aim of the present paper is to verify the effectiveness of a hybrid control strategy, combining base isolation and non-traditional tuned mass dampers (TMDs) (i.e., TMDs with dashpots directly connected to the ground) in suppressing structural vibrations of high-rise buildings. The study was conducted for structures with a different number of stories … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these reductions might not be as pronounced as those for short-period structures, they are significant as compared to the improvements achieved in the responses of long-period structures using other well-adopted seismic protection systems. For example, tuned mass dampers with practical mass ratios (e.g., 1-5%) can provide reductions in the base shear and floor acceleration responses of high-rise buildings not greater than 20-30% (e.g., see Soto-Brito and Ruiz, 1999;Bekdas and Nigdeli, 2013;Anajafi and Medina, 2018;Naderpour et al, 2019). Furthermore, as shown in the present study, for FF excitations, the lateral-strength reduction caused by isolation systems can potentially even reduce the global displacement responses of the structures with relatively long non-isolated periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these reductions might not be as pronounced as those for short-period structures, they are significant as compared to the improvements achieved in the responses of long-period structures using other well-adopted seismic protection systems. For example, tuned mass dampers with practical mass ratios (e.g., 1-5%) can provide reductions in the base shear and floor acceleration responses of high-rise buildings not greater than 20-30% (e.g., see Soto-Brito and Ruiz, 1999;Bekdas and Nigdeli, 2013;Anajafi and Medina, 2018;Naderpour et al, 2019). Furthermore, as shown in the present study, for FF excitations, the lateral-strength reduction caused by isolation systems can potentially even reduce the global displacement responses of the structures with relatively long non-isolated periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, many scholars have adopted the method of adding various dampers (e.g., viscous dampers, magnetorheological dampers, friction dampers, etc.) into the isolation layer of the structure to limit its displacement [21][22][23][24]. As a semi-active control, the input voltage of the magnetorheological (MR) fluid is calculated by the feedback of external excitation to change the viscous coefficient of the MR damper, which can approach the control effect of active control without a large amount of energy input [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], and it also performed well in the isolation layer [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vibrations of buildings may be induced by different types of dynamic excitations. The most common reasons of such vibrations are related to wind, earthquakes (see, for example, [1][2][3][4]), piling works, large mechanical vibrating entities, jumping of people or vibrations resulting from passing of vehicles and trains [5,6]. The last reason may lead to traffic-induced vibrations of geological structures generating negative effects, both for buildings and residents of buildings subjected to these dynamic excitations [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%