2004
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2003.820215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Response of Transformer-Bushing Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last 20 years, many studies had been done to qualify the seismic behavior of bushings and to raise their reliability. The additional flexural stiffeners on the cover plate were beneficial to the seismic response of the bushing, because it increased the fundamental frequency of the bushing close to that of rigid base condition . Considering the additional stiffeners, the maximum reduction in bending moment at the base of bushing was achieved in a range of 53% to 86% compared with the flexible cover plate .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last 20 years, many studies had been done to qualify the seismic behavior of bushings and to raise their reliability. The additional flexural stiffeners on the cover plate were beneficial to the seismic response of the bushing, because it increased the fundamental frequency of the bushing close to that of rigid base condition . Considering the additional stiffeners, the maximum reduction in bending moment at the base of bushing was achieved in a range of 53% to 86% compared with the flexible cover plate .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional flexural stiffeners on the cover plate were beneficial to the seismic response of the bushing, because it increased the fundamental frequency of the bushing close to that of rigid base condition. [8,9] Considering the additional stiffeners, the maximum reduction in bending moment at the base of bushing was achieved in a range of 53% to 86% compared with the flexible cover plate. [10] In addition, there are also many other methods used to mitigate the seismic responses of the bushing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filiatrault and Matt (2006) Rocking response and overturning of equipment Makris and Roussos (1998); Makris and Zhang (1999) Rigid electrical equipment anchored to a base foundation (e.g., transformer) Black (2001, 2002) Electrical substation equipment connected by nonlinear rigid bus conductors Song et al (2007) Whittaker et al (2004) The previous vulnerability studies showed that the analytical and experimental works are undertaken for a particular failure mode. Song et al (2007) and Hong et al (2001) worked on the response of cable connected equipment; Ersoy and Saadeghvaziri (2004) worked on seismic interaction of transformer and bushing system; Makris and Roussos (1998) and 1994 was used to develop these fragility curves. Anagnos (1999) did not consider the statistical dependence among the observations while estimating the equipment fragilities.…”
Section: Previous Vulnerability Studies On Substationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To get a better understanding of the dynamic characteristics of the bushings, the finite element method (FEM) was also adopted. Ersoy and Saadeghvaziri investigated the influences of the flexibility of the transformer's top plate on the dynamic responses of the bushing in SAP2000. Koliou provided the fragility curves of bushings with different mounted conditions and concluded that the additional stiffeners on the top plate of the transformer would be one of the most efficient retrofit approaches for reducing the bending moment at the base of the bushing Moreover, many/more techniques such as the additional stiffener, the increased preload, and the stiffer gaskets were also adopted to enhance the mounted conditions of the bushings, which would reduce the input motions at the base of the bushing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%