2011
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2010.493339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic responses of a highway viaduct considering vehicles of design live load as dynamic system during moderate earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, the seismic response of the bridge was amplified when the vehicles were treated as additional vertical masses. The conclusions of the more recent similar study of He et al , are in agreement with those of . Tanabe et al , studied numerically the behavior of the Shinkansen trains and railway bridges during earthquakes and checked experimentally part of their results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the contrary, the seismic response of the bridge was amplified when the vehicles were treated as additional vertical masses. The conclusions of the more recent similar study of He et al , are in agreement with those of . Tanabe et al , studied numerically the behavior of the Shinkansen trains and railway bridges during earthquakes and checked experimentally part of their results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…That study also stressed the importance of the vertical ground motion component on the stability of the vehicle. Kim et al studied the seismic response of interacting vehicle–bridge systems under moderate earthquakes, for steel monorail bridges , and for highway viaducts . They showed that it is not realistic to treat the train vehicle merely as additional mass, as suggested by most seismic codes worldwide, for example, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies (Kim and Kawatani 2006;Kim et al 2011;He et al 2011) verified that the seismic response of the bridge is reduced when the dynamics of the vehicles are properly simulated, whereas it is amplified when the vehicles are treated as additional vertical masses. Yang and Wu (2002) investigated the stability of train vehicles, stationary or moving, on bridges shaken by earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The observations from the numerical analysis demonstrated that heavy vehicles, acting as dynamic system, can reduce the seismic response of bridges under a ground motion with low frequency characteristics, but the vehicles have the opposite effect and slightly amplify the seismic response of the bridge under high frequency ground motion. A recent study on the effects of live load on a highway bridge under a moderate earthquake in the horizontal and vertical directions is reported by Kim et al [2011]. The study concluded that the seismic response of the bridge is amplified when the vehicle is considered as merely additional gravity load or mass and the amplification is dependent on the relationship between the fundamental frequency of the bridge and the response spectrum of the ground motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%