2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Retrofit of Joints of a Full-Scale 3D Reinforced Concrete Frame with FRP Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a number of studies have been conducted on seismic retrofitting methods that can mitigate the disadvantages of the existing seismic retrofitting approaches. The research has focused on seismic retrofitting methods using fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) [2,[4][5][6][7][8], steel beams [3,9], and dampers [10][11][12][13][14]. Although new seismic retrofitting methods have been studied to improve the existing retrofitting methods, there are some drawbacks; the drawbacks of the seismic retrofitting method using FRP are the relatively high cost of epoxies, inability to attach on wet surfaces, difficulty conducting post-earthquake assessment of the damage suffered by the reinforced concrete that is behind the undamaged FRP jackets, and so on [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a number of studies have been conducted on seismic retrofitting methods that can mitigate the disadvantages of the existing seismic retrofitting approaches. The research has focused on seismic retrofitting methods using fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) [2,[4][5][6][7][8], steel beams [3,9], and dampers [10][11][12][13][14]. Although new seismic retrofitting methods have been studied to improve the existing retrofitting methods, there are some drawbacks; the drawbacks of the seismic retrofitting method using FRP are the relatively high cost of epoxies, inability to attach on wet surfaces, difficulty conducting post-earthquake assessment of the damage suffered by the reinforced concrete that is behind the undamaged FRP jackets, and so on [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6a. Other approaches may utilize FRPs to be adhered diagonally at the joints [23], shown in Fig. 6b.…”
Section: Rc Beam-column Joint Strengthening Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adibi et al [ 79 ] employed steel angles prestressed by crossties to retrofit exterior concrete beam-column connections with hook-ended plain bars seismically. Cosgun et al [ 80 ] examined the RC frames’ experimental behavior with FRP strengthening to check FRP’s suitability for avoiding joint failure. D’Ayala et al [ 81 ] also evaluated the application of FRP strengthening for plain bar-reinforced interior joints.…”
Section: Possible Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%