2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-017-0120-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic safety evaluation of reinforced concrete masonry infilled frames using macro modelling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, the basic discretisation of the full infill wall shown in Figure A consists of a single macro‐element (Figure 2B), whereas that of the open infill wall in Figure A consists of five macro‐elements (Figure 3B). Starting from these basic discretisations, a mesh refinement (Figures 2C and C) can be considered to achieve a more accurate simulation of the damage development within the infill and a more refined description of the interaction between infill and frame . In any case, the values of the mechanical parameters of the macro‐element do not vary because of the presence of openings, but only depend on the geometry of the panels composing the mesh and the mechanical properties of the masonry by means of the calibration procedures described in the following section.…”
Section: The Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As an example, the basic discretisation of the full infill wall shown in Figure A consists of a single macro‐element (Figure 2B), whereas that of the open infill wall in Figure A consists of five macro‐elements (Figure 3B). Starting from these basic discretisations, a mesh refinement (Figures 2C and C) can be considered to achieve a more accurate simulation of the damage development within the infill and a more refined description of the interaction between infill and frame . In any case, the values of the mechanical parameters of the macro‐element do not vary because of the presence of openings, but only depend on the geometry of the panels composing the mesh and the mechanical properties of the masonry by means of the calibration procedures described in the following section.…”
Section: The Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As proved by some research studies, eg, Pantò et al, masonry infills may even represent the main earthquake resistant part of buildings designed to resist gravity loads only. In any case, depending on the mechanical properties of infills and RC framed structure and on the regularity of both in plan and in elevation distributions of masonry panels, the presence of infills may be advantageous or disadvantageous for the seismic performance of buildings …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed macro-node element has been inspired by a plane macro-element proposed by the authors for the simulation of nonlinear behaviour of unreinforced masonry buildings [6,7,8,9] and masonry infilled frames [10,11]. The basic element can be described by referring to a simple mechanical representation in which the element is regarded as an articulated quadrilateral endowed with along-side interfaces that, consistently to a fibre discretization, account for both the concrete and steel bars contributions.…”
Section: The Proposed Macro-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the detailed local numerical model allowed justifying the partial collapse of the frescoed vault. Finally, a vulnerability assessment of the building in terms of peak ground acceleration (PGA) was performed according to the Eurocode 8 [29,30], as already done with reference to reinforced concrete masonry infilled frames [31]. The procedure was compared with an alternative vulnerability assessment based on nonlinear dynamic analyses conducted on equivalent single degree of freedom systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%